Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Henrique de Oliveira: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Sir Sputnik (talk | contribs) Creating deletion discussion page for Pedro Henrique de Oliveira. (TW) |
Sir Sputnik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources AFD|Pedro Henrique de Oliveira}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Pedro Henrique de Oliveira}}) |
||
Contested PROD. Concern was ''Article was tagged for speedy deletion per [[WP:A7]], very poor article.'' While this is not a valid delete rationale, the article fails both relevant notability guidelines. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails both [[WP:NSPORT]] and [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Sir Sputnik|Sir Sputnik]] ([[User talk:Sir Sputnik|talk]]) 05:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC) |
Contested PROD. Concern was ''Article was tagged for speedy deletion per [[WP:A7]], very poor article.'' While this is not a valid delete rationale, the article fails both relevant notability guidelines. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails both [[WP:NSPORT]] and [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Sir Sputnik|Sir Sputnik]] ([[User talk:Sir Sputnik|talk]]) 05:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
:<small>Note: This discussion has been included in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football#Nominations for deletion and page moves|WikiProject Football]]'s list of association football-related deletions. [[User:Sir Sputnik|Sir Sputnik]] ([[User talk:Sir Sputnik|talk]]) 05:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)</small> |
|||
Revision as of 05:58, 19 February 2015
- Pedro Henrique de Oliveira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article was tagged for speedy deletion per WP:A7, very poor article. While this is not a valid delete rationale, the article fails both relevant notability guidelines. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails both WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)