Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Henrique de Oliveira: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Sir Sputnik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Sir Sputnik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
||
The result was '''nomination withdrawn'''. [[User:Sir Sputnik|Sir Sputnik]] ([[User talk:Sir Sputnik|talk]]) 15: |
The result was '''nomination withdrawn'''. [[User:Sir Sputnik|Sir Sputnik]] ([[User talk:Sir Sputnik|talk]]) 15:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
===[[Pedro Henrique de Oliveira]]=== |
===[[Pedro Henrique de Oliveira]]=== |
||
Revision as of 15:29, 19 February 2015
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Pedro Henrique de Oliveira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article was tagged for speedy deletion per WP:A7, very poor article. While this is not a valid delete rationale, the article fails both relevant notability guidelines. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails both WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Played (seven matches, one goal) in 2014 for Boa Esporte in Campeonato Brasileiro Série B, which is listed as a fully professional league and so passes WP:NSPORT. Sorry, this is probably my fault: I removed the prod (one of a number of rather odd deletion requests added by the same editor) but never got round to adding a clear assertion of notability to the article. Have now done so. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:03, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - as Struway2 pointed, this passes WP:NFOOTBALL as he has played in a fully professional league. I am assuming soccerway.com is a WP:RS since I cannot read Portuguese to check other sources. Tigraan (talk) 10:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - meets WP:NFOOTBALL; needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 13:04, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.