Talk:Constitution Party of Alabama: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
COMPLETE MERGER: per AfD discussion result notation |
m Substing templates: {{Unsigned}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info. |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{talkheader}} |
{{talkheader}} |
||
==.== |
==.== |
||
I don't know whether the person suggesting deletion of these sites is a Libertarian or not, but it does strike me as interesting that the Constitution Party state sites are quite substantial compared to the state Libertarian party sites. For example, the Minnesota Constitution Party site has lists of those who were on the ballot and a short list of those elected yet is on the chopping block. The Minneosta Libertarian Party site has nothing, yet is not challenged at all for deletion. IF this person is Libertarian as suggested by other writers, then it stinks of a political hit. I have not personally reviewed any evidence on that person, but it seems like the Libertarian sites would be much more ripe for "picking" if we're really interested in deleting entries that have no value. |
I don't know whether the person suggesting deletion of these sites is a Libertarian or not, but it does strike me as interesting that the Constitution Party state sites are quite substantial compared to the state Libertarian party sites. For example, the Minnesota Constitution Party site has lists of those who were on the ballot and a short list of those elected yet is on the chopping block. The Minneosta Libertarian Party site has nothing, yet is not challenged at all for deletion. IF this person is Libertarian as suggested by other writers, then it stinks of a political hit. I have not personally reviewed any evidence on that person, but it seems like the Libertarian sites would be much more ripe for "picking" if we're really interested in deleting entries that have no value. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Whitsj2|Whitsj2]] ([[User talk:Whitsj2|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Whitsj2|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
||
:I'm certainly open to an AFD for ''any'' article that merits it, whether it is about political party or underwater basketweaving. Suggest you read [[WP:AGF]] before wondering about other editors' motives. If you think some Libertarian article merits deletion, there's a process you can follow to propose that. [[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 18:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
:I'm certainly open to an AFD for ''any'' article that merits it, whether it is about political party or underwater basketweaving. Suggest you read [[WP:AGF]] before wondering about other editors' motives. If you think some Libertarian article merits deletion, there's a process you can follow to propose that. [[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 18:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
::'''Yep''' I'm a libertarian commando seeking out the state pages of other parties to get rid of them. In fact I'm so good at it, that I practiced by trying to get rid of [[Libertarian Party of California]]. [/Sarc] |
::'''Yep''' I'm a libertarian commando seeking out the state pages of other parties to get rid of them. In fact I'm so good at it, that I practiced by trying to get rid of [[Libertarian Party of California]]. [/Sarc] |
||
Latest revision as of 22:02, 19 February 2015
 | The contents of the Constitution Party of Alabama page were merged into Constitution Party (United States) on March 10, 2014 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Constitution Party of Alabama redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
.
[edit]I don't know whether the person suggesting deletion of these sites is a Libertarian or not, but it does strike me as interesting that the Constitution Party state sites are quite substantial compared to the state Libertarian party sites. For example, the Minnesota Constitution Party site has lists of those who were on the ballot and a short list of those elected yet is on the chopping block. The Minneosta Libertarian Party site has nothing, yet is not challenged at all for deletion. IF this person is Libertarian as suggested by other writers, then it stinks of a political hit. I have not personally reviewed any evidence on that person, but it seems like the Libertarian sites would be much more ripe for "picking" if we're really interested in deleting entries that have no value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitsj2 (talk • contribs)
- I'm certainly open to an AFD for any article that merits it, whether it is about political party or underwater basketweaving. Suggest you read WP:AGF before wondering about other editors' motives. If you think some Libertarian article merits deletion, there's a process you can follow to propose that. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yep I'm a libertarian commando seeking out the state pages of other parties to get rid of them. In fact I'm so good at it, that I practiced by trying to get rid of Libertarian Party of California. [/Sarc]
- I can't recall how I got involved with these articles, but I've been involved for a while and taken one to AfD at the moment. I'm certainly no Libertarian either and would be just as happy to take any similar articles to AfD. Dougweller (talk) 21:33, 12 February 2014 (UTC)