Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jbc01: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→User:Jbc01: NOT CENSORED is about articles; also, WP is not a repository |
→User:Jbc01: This is about violating the userpage guidelines. The pictures should have never been put there |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Comment''' I think Sladen's solution is the best. I had the chance to look at a couple of the images and it appears that the user was the photographer, possibly of all of them. Though sexual, they are not pornographic. There is no blogging going on. The editor describes their editing interests and shows examples of their photography. Though I have no interest whatsover in this proclivity, packed movie theaters shows that millions do. Wikipedia is not censored. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 19:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' I think Sladen's solution is the best. I had the chance to look at a couple of the images and it appears that the user was the photographer, possibly of all of them. Though sexual, they are not pornographic. There is no blogging going on. The editor describes their editing interests and shows examples of their photography. Though I have no interest whatsover in this proclivity, packed movie theaters shows that millions do. Wikipedia is not censored. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 19:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
**[[WP:NOTCENSORED]] is about article space, not other spaces. If he's a photographer, he can take his images to Commons or some other appropriate space. Wikipedia is [[WP:NOTREPOSITORY]] not a repository. [[User:Lightbreather|Lightbreather]] ([[User talk:Lightbreather|talk]]) 19:16, 25 February 2015 (UTC) |
**[[WP:NOTCENSORED]] is about article space, not other spaces. If he's a photographer, he can take his images to Commons or some other appropriate space. Wikipedia is [[WP:NOTREPOSITORY]] not a repository. [[User:Lightbreather|Lightbreather]] ([[User talk:Lightbreather|talk]]) 19:16, 25 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
*[[WP:Userpage]] This is about violating the userpage guidelines. The pictures should have never been put there. Cullen look closer those pics are shared. We are talking about removing them from the talk page permanently. I found that four pages containing these images were all interlinked. Possibly a sock with back up pages. Who knows why they are there and it does not matter. The easiest thing is to delete the user page as it is abandoned and is sexually provocative. [[Special:Contributions/172.56.8.170|172.56.8.170]] ([[User talk:172.56.8.170|talk]]) 19:27, 25 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:27, 25 February 2015
WP:UP#NOT, WP:NOTGALLERY, WP:NOTBLOG Lightbreather (talk) 18:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The user page contains sexually provocative images of nude women in bondage which is in violation of user page guidelines.
- There is broad consensus that you should not have any image in your userspace that would bring the project into disrepute and you may be asked to remove such images. Content clearly intended as sexually provocative (images and in some cases text) or to cause distress and shock that appears to have little or no project benefit or using Wikipedia only as a web host or personal pages or for advocacy, may be removed by any user (or deleted), subject to appeal at deletion review.[Note 2] Context should be taken into account. Simple personal disclosures of a non-provocative nature on sexual matters (such as LGBT userboxes and relationship status) are unaffected. 172.56.8.170 (talk) 18:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment, as the accounts would appear to be inactive, I have commented out[1] the gallery per WP:USERPAGE#Images that would bring the project into disrepute in the mean-time. —Sladen (talk) 18:45, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I think Sladen's solution is the best. I had the chance to look at a couple of the images and it appears that the user was the photographer, possibly of all of them. Though sexual, they are not pornographic. There is no blogging going on. The editor describes their editing interests and shows examples of their photography. Though I have no interest whatsover in this proclivity, packed movie theaters shows that millions do. Wikipedia is not censored. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 19:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- WP:NOTCENSORED is about article space, not other spaces. If he's a photographer, he can take his images to Commons or some other appropriate space. Wikipedia is WP:NOTREPOSITORY not a repository. Lightbreather (talk) 19:16, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- WP:Userpage This is about violating the userpage guidelines. The pictures should have never been put there. Cullen look closer those pics are shared. We are talking about removing them from the talk page permanently. I found that four pages containing these images were all interlinked. Possibly a sock with back up pages. Who knows why they are there and it does not matter. The easiest thing is to delete the user page as it is abandoned and is sexually provocative. 172.56.8.170 (talk) 19:27, 25 February 2015 (UTC)