User talk:LacMJ: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:56, 28 February 2015

Hello, LacMJ, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here!

I work with the Wiki Education Foundation, and help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment. If there's anything I can do to help with your assignment (or, for that matter, any other aspect of Wikipedia) please feel free to drop me a note. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work!

		The WikiCookie
		You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more.

Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. LacMJ (talk) 01:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Test

Testing 123. Can Anybody Hear Me? LacMJ (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LacMJ!

I am also in CHM437S, the University of Toronto's bioinorganic chemistry class! I look forward to reading your article on ATOX1.

All the best,

☺ Czeer (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am also enrolled in CHM437S, and I would like to thank you for the inspiring userpage! Your userpage helped me with my own, thanks!

D.jae.lee (talk) 17:23, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear LacMJ,

I don't remember the M and J genes in the lac operon.

--Rfwh (talk) 17:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have you done with your article?

Hi LacMJ, have you finished editing your article? I'm interested in your protein. Daamoy (talk) 17:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daamoy, it would be nice for you to take a look at my article and let me know what you think. Thanks! LacMJ (talk) 18:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hi, thank you for reviewing my article. I read your article and I have a few comments for you:

I think your article is good to understand. You mentioned intersting details but didn't make it too complex for someone who didn't go through all the literature.
In your introduction I wouldn't mention the names of the copper transporters (ATP7A and ATP7B), this is probably too much information. And in the last sentence of your summary, I'd just leave the part "where its function has been extensively studied" out.
I would put the section about homology and nomenclature either before or after the section about the function, in my opinion it fits better in the context there.
I saw that in the original article the author mentioned the 5q-syndrome and suggested that the protein might play a role in cancer carcinogenesis. I think it would be interesting to include this in your article as well if these topics are still up to date (probably you didn't mention it because current research has proofed the suggestions wrong)

I hope you find my comments helpful, have a nice weekend! Vogel ant789 (talk) 00:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 Thanks!
 [[User:LacMJ|LacMJ]] ([[User talk:LacMJ#top|talk]]) 18:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
+== Peer Review ==
+Hi,
+thank you for reviewing my article. I read your article and I have a few comments for you:
+* I think your article is good to understand. You mentioned intersting details but didn't make it too complex for someone who didn't go through all the literature.
+* In your introduction I wouldn't mention the names of the copper transporters (ATP7A and ATP7B), this is probably too much information. And in the last sentence of your summary, I'd just leave the part "where its function has been extensively studied" out.
+* I would put the section about homology and nomenclature either before or after the section about the function, in my opinion it fits better in the context there.
+* I saw that in the original article the author mentioned the 5q-syndrome and suggested that the protein might play a role in cancer carcinogenesis. I think it would be interesting to include this in your article as well if these topics are still up to date (probably you didn't mention it because current research has proofed the suggestions wrong)
+I hope you find my comments helpful, have a nice weekend! [[User:Vogel ant789|Vogel ant789]] ([[User talk:Vogel ant789|talk]]) 00:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)