Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y. Srihari: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:44, 28 February 2015

Y. Srihari

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

I've removed some spam, but he seems of dubious notability, and the references are very suspect even after I've removed links to Yellow pages and Wikipedia lists of Indian medical associations Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - all except one of the references were business directory listings or adverts for the person, and they have been removed. There is no indication that this person is notable as an actor or as a medical doctor. The Global Medical Association is perhaps a notable organisation, but it doesn't follow that its president is a notable person. And the fact that he is a member of the Indian Medical Association is not a claim to notability. --bonadea contributions talk 09:16, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:GNG. One reference about a movie he was in does not qualify as "significant coverage." I too once appeared in a commercial movie, but that doesn't make me notable enough for WP. I could find no information on the medical organization over which he presides. ubiquity (talk) 15:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: A new article about the same person has appeared at Dr sreeharii. ubiquity (talk) 21:59, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It has now been CSD as A10.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 23:32, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following comment was misplace at WP:REFUND:

r .srihari is president of global medical association. nearly 40,000 doctors are participating in this association, he is also member of indian medical association,2,50,000 doctors of india participating in this associations. wikipedia articles clearly states the importence of indian medical association and global medical association. so the article y.srihari is good . so i am requesting you dont delate it.............................naaga -115.241.109.31 (talk) 11:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

dr y,srihari is member of indian medical association,2,50,000 doctors participating in this association,wikipedia article confirms this. so this article is nice, .....mani

--ThaddeusB (talk) 15:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I find it surprising that an organisation claiming 40,000 members seems to have no internet footprint whatsoever Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:11, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'Comment I left a note at the article's talk page asking for verification of some of these claims, in the hopes that one such source would enable the tracking down of other sources. No reply thus far, however, and I had a great deal of difficulty finding sources that did much more than verify that Srihiari exists. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 00:42, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment/FYI: I have requested semi-protection of the article - not because of all the sock/meatpuppetry that is obviously going on there, but the AfD template has been removed by six different IPs at this point and that's simply disruptive. --bonadea contributions talk 11:29, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:44, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 *'''Comment'' I left a note at the article's talk page asking for verification of some of these claims, in the hopes that one such source would enable the tracking down of other sources. No reply thus far, however, and I had a great deal of difficulty finding sources that did much more than verify that Srihiari exists. &ndash;&nbsp;''[[User:Philosopher|Philosopher]]''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Philosopher|Let us reason together.]]</sup> 00:42, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 *'''Comment/FYI''': I have requested semi-protection of the article - not because of all the sock/meatpuppetry that is obviously going on there, but the AfD template has been removed by six different IPs at this point and that's simply disruptive. --''[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 11:29, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
+*::'''Semi-protected''' now [[User:Jimfbleak|<b style="font-family:chiller;color:red">Jimfbleak</b>]] - [[User talk:Jimfbleak|<span style="font-family:arial;color:green">talk to me?</span>]] 15:44, 28 February 2015 (UTC)