Jump to content

Wikipedia:Spoiler warning/RfC: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
I don't understand your objection. Perhaps you can try to edit them rather than removing them?
I think what I'm saying is the "arguments" were provided in defense of the subject, not a argument for them. Such would be non-relevant if the rfc weren't initiated.
Line 44: Line 44:
*Can be seen as a neutral label such as "Theme" or "Genre"
*Can be seen as a neutral label such as "Theme" or "Genre"
*Avoids needing to restrict information to specific sections (such as "Plot details")
*Avoids needing to restrict information to specific sections (such as "Plot details")
*They are no more subjective than any other decision an editor has to make in the process of writing/improving an article
*Do not constitute a violation of any Wikipedia policy so there is no basis for their project-wide removal



{{col-2}}
{{col-2}}

Revision as of 23:18, 20 July 2006

This is a request for comment (RfC) on the use of spoiler tags. This RFC aims to gather community opinion on the Wikipedia:Spoiler warning guidelines and it's companion templates: {{spoiler}}, {{endspoiler}}, {{spoiler-about}}, {{spoiler-other}}, {{spoiler-blank}}, {{magic-spoiler}}, {{Solution}}, and {{Spoiler-solicitation}}.

Previous discussions

Older discussions

Examples of current usage

Arguments for and against

This is a very brief summary of the major arguments for and against the use of spoiler tags. Note that this is only intended to be an extremely brief summary, and all substantive reasoning of arguments can be found on this page's discussion page.

RfC discussion

All new discussion should be directed to this page's discussion page, where arguments and suggested solutions are discussed. Discussion should not be added below.