User talk:Froggy95/sandbox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Templar

resources for Knights Templar wiki page The real history of the Knights Templar: by Sharan Newman This book is composed of much information based on the Knights Templar that is Information that could be verified by the author and not just speculated information. This book was her quest to find out about the Knights Templar after being asked the question were the Templar real, and even the very plot of the book The Da vinci Code

The Knights Templar: by Stephen Howarth This book is a compilation of factual information pertaining to the Knights Templar. But not just the factual information but also the mysticism of the Templar are explored. But how the mysticism is explained and how it came to be through facts stated by actual Templar knights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Froggy95 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

My plans for revision In the Wikipedia article I have read and made a paper on the very large problems to this article. Many of which was either bad information that linked to bad sources or un trustworthy resources. Many things have to be done to correct this article starting with article citation. The citation of the article was almost horrid. Yet to the articles credit it did contain some very much correct sources such as books and even the Catholic Church websites. However there were some sources that had to come to light such as some of the websites that were used in the article. one of which was a conspiracy theory website that itself upon inspection revealed that it had absolutely no reputable information whatsoever. Being that anyone could edit that website as well or actually donate information without having to back up their claims with citation. Not just articles that had very odd citation but also books. Most to the credit of the article the books were good for information but then there was a book in the citation that actually was a novel. Being a novel it was a fiction connotation of the Templar being an underground organization. We may not know all about them but we can’t take info from a novel based on a authors total interpretation. Seeing as citation can change an entire battlefield we still have to address the information. much of which was good but there still was no flawless wiki page. Some information that was presented was up to debate by some historians such as the use of symbols by the Templar. I believe it would be important that we mention all speculation on a topic rather than pick one of the beliefs and state it above all else. The article was good but i plan to fix this article by stating the very much strange nature of its citation by fixing the citation everything should fall into place. With bad citation out then false or distorted info will be neglected leaving room for factual information.