Jump to content

Talk:Microbiota: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 31: Line 31:


==Move discussion in progress==
==Move discussion in progress==
There is a move discussion in progress on [[Talk:Microbiota decussata#Requested move 27 January 2015|Talk:Microbiota decussata]] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!-- Talk:Microbiota crosspost --> —[[User:RMCD bot|RMCD bot]] 20:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on [[Talk:Microbiota (disambiguation)#Requested move 27 January 2015|Talk:Microbiota (disambiguation)]] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!-- Talk:Microbiota crosspost --> —[[User:RMCD bot|RMCD bot]] 20:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:46, 12 March 2015

WikiProject iconMicrobiology C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opening

Misleading opening: "A microbiome is "the ecological community of commensal, symbiotic, and pathogenic microorganisms that literally share our body space." This is misleading, because one gets the impression that "microbiome" is limited to the human body. Better have this citation move further down when it comes to history of this term. Mosquito337 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.140.90.18 (talk) 16:36, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

The last sentence in the "Introduction" section reads: "Indeed, an organism's complement of microbial inhabitants can be considered as a forgotten organ" (emphasis added). Besides needing a citation/source, was any microbiome ever really "forgotten"? If so, when was it last known? A better word is needed. --Thorwald (talk) 20:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lederberg-microbiome connecting reference still missing

There is no mention of microbiome in the linked J Lederberg article, though the microbiome article credits him with coining the term without providing any citation other than this link. Per wiki policy, we need to cite something appropriate, or remove this statement. Prof D. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.245.235 (talk) 23:18, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a citation to consult, as being the origin:
  J. Lederberg J & McCray AT (2001) ’Ome Sweet ’Omics—a genealogical treasury of words. Scientist 15:8.

This is cited by the following article, where the attribution of the term microbiome is made to Lederberg:

 The NIH HMP Working Group, J. Peterson, S. Garges, et al. (2009) The NIH Human Microbiome Project, Genome Res. 19: 2317-2323.

[Prof D]

Science writer needed

This is a terrific article, but could really use a rewrite for a general public audience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.137.191.47 (talk) 21:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Microbbiome

It would be useful if there was a discussion about colon fecal transplants and how disease has been cured by this procedure — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:3:9380:9AA:D58F:3480:9F62:84D (talk) 01:48, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Microbiota (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]