User talk:43.224.156.72

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   Mike V • Talk 19:33, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

43.224.156.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

@Mike V: What do you mean, man? This IP is not an open or anonymising proxy at all. See whatismyipaddress.com/ip/43.224.156.72. (It clearly reveals even the location.)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Mike V|Mike V]]:</span> What do you mean, man? This IP is ''not'' an open or anonymising proxy at all. See <span class="url">[http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/43.224.156.72 whatismyipaddress<wbr/>.com<wbr/>/ip<wbr/>/43<wbr/>.224<wbr/>.156<wbr/>.72]</span>. (It clearly reveals even the location.) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Mike V|Mike V]]:</span> What do you mean, man? This IP is ''not'' an open or anonymising proxy at all. See <span class="url">[http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/43.224.156.72 whatismyipaddress<wbr/>.com<wbr/>/ip<wbr/>/43<wbr/>.224<wbr/>.156<wbr/>.72]</span>. (It clearly reveals even the location.) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Mike V|Mike V]]:</span> What do you mean, man? This IP is ''not'' an open or anonymising proxy at all. See <span class="url">[http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/43.224.156.72 whatismyipaddress<wbr/>.com<wbr/>/ip<wbr/>/43<wbr/>.224<wbr/>.156<wbr/>.72]</span>. (It clearly reveals even the location.) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

43.224.156.72 (talk) 19:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

@Mike V: What disruptive editing? You are not willing accept the fact that you made a mistake in thinking I am a proxy. I think to you should go and block yourself. 43.224.156.72 (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism spotted

I spptted this talk page vandalism: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Babe_Ruth&diff=prev&oldid=651231779 Please unlock me so that I can revert such edits myself. 43.224.156.72 (talk) 19:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

It still has not been reverted! 43.224.156.72 (talk) 19:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)