User talk:Chrissy.nesbitt

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick D. Reese (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BenLinus1214 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frederick D. Reese and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BenLinus1214^talk 15:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Chrissy.nesbitt, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BenLinus1214talk 15:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Frederick D. Reese has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Frederick D. Reese. Thanks! BenLinus1214^talk 21:21, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Frederick D. Reese

Great work! My apologies for putting up a stub without knowing of your full page. I wish it had been approved on March 2, then Reese would have had a page up in time for the Selma Jubilee. I added him to the template and some other pages. Nice job, you should of course get full credit for the page, and good to meet you. Randy Kryn 23:47 15 March, 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! No apologies necessary, for sure. I'm glad you put back in the external sources and other helpful information I erased when I wrote over when I replaced your article... I don't have lots of experience and I'm still a little clumsy. I'm pleased to meet you too! You have a fascinating user page. Chrissy.nesbitt (talk) 01:23, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

If not apology, an explanation. Happened to be in Selma for the Jubilee, and met a woman who worked directly with Reese. I mentioned that he really needed a Wikipedia page, and that I had a very short stub already in my sandbox, and that I'd put it up after returning and alert her so she could add to it. Then, yesterday, I was glad to see that you've already organized a full page, and will call her to tell her. As I said, you had a good page set to go before the Jubilee, but now that it's finally up, congrats on good work. How did you become interested in Reese and writing about him here? Thanks for the comment on my user page, just rambling there, and when will we see your user page?? I met Rev. Reese only once, ten years ago, and wouldn't it be nice if he and some of the other old-timers make the 60th reunion. Cheers and glasses raised, Randy Kryn 11:52 16 March, 2015 (UTC)

What an wonderful day, and I agree, how wonderful it would be to be together on this earth for the 60th. I started learning about Rev. Reese after watching the movie Selma and reading up on names in the cast list. Lots of reasons why I dedicated the time to his page. I think it's important for us to know the history of nonviolent revolution. I'm a teacher activist, and I love knowing about others who have followed that path. And I think we need to talk about history, of civil rights, of music, of science, of whatever, so that we recognize that it's not just one or two big names, but the whole constellation of people, hundreds, thousands, millions, who come together to create the culture we live in! Chrissy.nesbitt (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick D. Reese (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kharkiv07 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frederick D. Reese and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kharkiv07^Talk 00:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)