Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa treuman: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:48, 12 October 2004

The page is really just a vanity page with no reason that the subject is particularly notable. 216.102.6.176 20:08, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) [zll]

delete and I'm sure she and her husband are very nice, but doesn't appear to be noteworthy. (anon votes don't count btw) Dunc_Harris|☺ 20:09, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
delete but let's wish her nonetheless, as the soon extinct page suggests, a life long and full of happiness and success --French Tourist 20:10, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
delete (not notable) but best wishes --Cje 20:12, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. There is also a process for candidates for rapid deletion (double bracketted {delete} ), which saves the clumsy process of voting like this. Wetman 20:13, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- comment: this article is too sane to be speedy deleted, alas.--Ianb 20:14, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
delete. How sweet. Now let's put that article on a horse-drawn carriage and let it gallop into the sunset. --Ianb 20:14, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete, ad for JDate. JFW | T@lk 20:17, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. I suspect this is someone writing an article for their significant other, much the way people name stars. It's cute, but doesn't belong here. Sorry. --Improv 20:48, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 *'''delete'''. How sweet. Now let's put that article on a horse-drawn carriage and let it gallop into the sunset. --[[User:Ianb|Ianb]] 20:14, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 *'''D'''elete, ad for JDate. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 20:17, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
+*'''Delete'''. I suspect this is someone writing an article for their significant other, much the way people name stars. It's cute, but doesn't belong here. Sorry. --[[User:Pgunn|Improv]] 20:48, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)