Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/45005: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
RickK (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
[[45005]]: vote:delete
Line 7: Line 7:
*** I hope so, and if there isn't one, it's time to create one ;-). This article BTW would not stand anyway, it does no justice to other connotations of that fine set of digits.[[User:Ianb|Ianb]] 21:24, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*** I hope so, and if there isn't one, it's time to create one ;-). This article BTW would not stand anyway, it does no justice to other connotations of that fine set of digits.[[User:Ianb|Ianb]] 21:24, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*Delete before it spreads. [[User:RickK|Rick]][[User talk:RickK|K]] 06:34, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)
*Delete before it spreads. [[User:RickK|Rick]][[User talk:RickK|K]] 06:34, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)
*'''Delete.''' [[User:Jni|jni]] 08:48, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:48, 12 October 2004

I thought there would be no pages for postcodes. JFW | T@lk 16:59, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete JFW | T@lk 16:59, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • comment: article content has been removed by original poster, comments in history indicate it could be speedied. Ianb 20:51, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
    • Yes, but is it indeed policy not to have Zip code articles? JFW | T@lk 21:00, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
      • I hope so, and if there isn't one, it's time to create one ;-). This article BTW would not stand anyway, it does no justice to other connotations of that fine set of digits.Ianb 21:24, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete before it spreads. RickK 06:34, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. jni 08:48, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)