Talk:Utica Comets: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:33, 13 April 2015

New York (state) C‑class Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ice Hockey C‑class

	Ice hockey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has multiple issues incl. reference and length issues

I'll sign in and start the process to get some help for this one it's got a few issues and POV problems.

Also it seems padded up with a little too much info especially the history.

The "Comets franchise" doesn't seem to be the current name so why do we need a huge slab of history. I will flag and check other like-articles to get a handle on how far out of wack this one is.

~Stew — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.131.133.91 (talk) 05:17, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Too much info"? Last time I checked, Wikipedia is not paper, so all reliably sourced info is welcome in any such article. I have already warned you before about removing all the sourced info, and really wish an admin would come and stop you. Tom Danson (talk) 12:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A good editor is what's needed here this article does have a lot if uncited info compared to like teams. It's a little ad-ish also and that's not acceptable on Wikipedia.

32.129.158.83 (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this franchise has the most history of any team in the AHL...what do you expect? Tom Danson (talk) 22:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's a bunch of the usual phony Utica overstatements. Care to prove that one Tom?

I have a feeling all these different IPs vandalizing this article are all one and the same person...that's why I'm requesting indefinite semi-protection for the article. Tom Danson (talk) 03:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 01:50, 13 April 2015 edit 32.161.37.126 (talk) →This article has multiple issues incl. reference and length issues ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:33, 13 April 2015 edit undo Tom Danson (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 44,615 edits →This article has multiple issues incl. reference and length issues Next edit →
Line 18:		Line 18:

	That's a bunch of the usual phony Utica overstatements. Care to prove that one Tom?		That's a bunch of the usual phony Utica overstatements. Care to prove that one Tom?
			:I have a feeling all these different IPs vandalizing this article are all one and the same person...that's why I'm requesting indefinite semi-protection for the article. [[User:Tom Danson\|Tom Danson]] ([[User talk:Tom Danson\|talk]]) 03:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)