Talk:Utica Comets: Difference between revisions
Tom Danson (talk | contribs) |
Keep talkin |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Fix the bullshit here, end of story. |
Fix the bullshit here, end of story. |
||
:Is that a threat? [[User:Tom Danson|Tom Danson]] ([[User talk:Tom Danson|talk]]) 17:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC) |
:Is that a threat? [[User:Tom Danson|Tom Danson]] ([[User talk:Tom Danson|talk]]) 17:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
:Well let's see...... 25 more tiny numeric edits and whacks. Keep talking. |
Revision as of 01:23, 14 April 2015
New York (state) C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Ice Hockey C‑class | |||||||
|
This article has multiple issues incl. reference and length issues
I'll sign in and start the process to get some help for this one it's got a few issues and POV problems.
Also it seems padded up with a little too much info especially the history.
The "Comets franchise" doesn't seem to be the current name so why do we need a huge slab of history. I will flag and check other like-articles to get a handle on how far out of wack this one is.
~Stew — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.131.133.91 (talk) 05:17, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- "Too much info"? Last time I checked, Wikipedia is not paper, so all reliably sourced info is welcome in any such article. I have already warned you before about removing all the sourced info, and really wish an admin would come and stop you. Tom Danson (talk) 12:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- A good editor is what's needed here this article does have a lot if uncited info compared to like teams. It's a little ad-ish also and that's not acceptable on Wikipedia.
32.129.158.83 (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Well, this franchise has the most history of any team in the AHL...what do you expect? Tom Danson (talk) 22:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
That's a bunch of the usual phony Utica overstatements. Care to prove that one Tom?
- I have a feeling all these different IPs vandalizing this article are all one and the same person...that's why I'm requesting indefinite semi-protection for the article. Tom Danson (talk) 03:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
That's ok Tom, just like other WP articles, each time you revert we wait a while roll the IPs and methodically go make 3-5 minor changes like dates and records on other random Wiki pages. Either fix the page or you'll never know how many pages get whacked. HUNDREDS already. Fix the bullshit here, end of story.
- Is that a threat? Tom Danson (talk) 17:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Well let's see...... 25 more tiny numeric edits and whacks. Keep talking.