User talk:Djkeddie: Difference between revisions
→Your [[WP:GA|GA]] nomination of [[Pentemont Abbey]]: new section |
→Your [[WP:GA|GA]] nomination of [[Pentemont Abbey]]: new section |
||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Pentemont Abbey]]== |
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Pentemont Abbey]]== |
||
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Pentemont Abbey]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Calvin999|Calvin999]]</small> -- [[User:Calvin999|Calvin999]] ([[User talk:Calvin999|talk]]) 13:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Pentemont Abbey]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Calvin999|Calvin999]]</small> -- [[User:Calvin999|Calvin999]] ([[User talk:Calvin999|talk]]) 13:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Pentemont Abbey]]== |
|||
The article [[Pentemont Abbey]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[Image:Symbol wait.svg|20px]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See [[Talk:Pentemont Abbey]] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Calvin999|Calvin999]]</small> -- [[User:Calvin999|Calvin999]] ([[User talk:Calvin999|talk]]) 17:41, 20 April 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:41, 20 April 2015
Your submission at AfC Stone Hill Church of Princeton was accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
jojo@nthony (talk) 09:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Keep it up
The merger process for Princeton Evangelical Fellowship isn't over yet, but if it does end up being merged please don't let that get you down. That article is really well written, as is Stone Hill Church of Princeton. If half the articles on Wikipedia were written as well as those we'd be in a better place. Wikipedia needs more contributors like you, and I hope you'll continue contributing regardless of the merger outcome. I think your plan to improve existing articles while you get more familiar with notability is a good one. Once you come back to creating new articles, I don't you should bother with AfC; you'll be ready. Lagrange613 21:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the encouragement. I'll try my hand at improving some existing articles and see how things go. Djkeddie (talk) 21:39, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Also, since nobody seems to have bothered to come here and welcome you, let me offer a belated welcome to Wikipedia! You seem to be finding your way around just fine, but here's a welcome template full of helpful links anyway.
|
Your GA nomination of Pentemont Abbey
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pentemont Abbey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 13:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pentemont Abbey
The article Pentemont Abbey you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pentemont Abbey for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2015 (UTC)