Talk:LED Throwie: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
comment about environmental effects of lithium batteries |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:stop removing legitimate information from the article simply because YOU think its obvious. a paragraph explaining the environmental concerns of such frivolous devices is perfectly apt in this article. besides, we aren't all "ginues" like you now are we? --[[User:Deglr6328|Deglr6328]] 04:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC) |
:stop removing legitimate information from the article simply because YOU think its obvious. a paragraph explaining the environmental concerns of such frivolous devices is perfectly apt in this article. besides, we aren't all "ginues" like you now are we? --[[User:Deglr6328|Deglr6328]] 04:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Yea a little more NPOV, please == |
|||
::I'm a flaming pinko commie liberal* (mostly) and even I thought that the environemental comments were a little skewed. We are the progressives of this world. We rely on FACTS not sensationalism like the Christo-Fascist Zombie Death Cult that runs our country right now. |
|||
::Almost anything made of plastic produces toxic pollution, which is why it's all made in Mexico and China where the govermentt doesn't mind killing it's own citizens. I'm sure unregulated lithium is similar, but that is irrelevent to THIS article and lithium isn't particularly toxic compared to carcinogenic plastic byproducts, expecailly as Lithium Manganese-DiOxide in disposable batteries. Please a little perspective. |
|||
::{*ANY neocon POS canclaim that so I would like to prove it by my daily radio listening: [http://www.airamericaradio.com] Rachel Maddow, Stacy Taylor (local guy), Al Franken, Ed Schultz (sometimes, he's a Hilary/Leiberman kiss ass), Rhandi Rhodes, Mike Malloy (my favourite), and then a little blog hopping like [http://cannonfire.blogspot.com], [http://powerofnarrative.blogspot.com], [http://www.crooksandliars.com], and [http://www.mediamatters.org].} |
|||
:::[[User:Tiki God|Tiki God]] 11:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:04, 26 July 2006
Ummm... someone was kind to add a picture... but its not working! :/ --220.238.150.184 11:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
it works
it dosn't matter if they are cheep to produse!
Stop adding that they can negitivly impact the inviroment! almost any cheep, mass manufacturable good can be an inviromental risc. its a given. Youo don't need to be a ginues to figgure that one out.
- stop removing legitimate information from the article simply because YOU think its obvious. a paragraph explaining the environmental concerns of such frivolous devices is perfectly apt in this article. besides, we aren't all "ginues" like you now are we? --Deglr6328 04:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Yea a little more NPOV, please
- I'm a flaming pinko commie liberal* (mostly) and even I thought that the environemental comments were a little skewed. We are the progressives of this world. We rely on FACTS not sensationalism like the Christo-Fascist Zombie Death Cult that runs our country right now.
- Almost anything made of plastic produces toxic pollution, which is why it's all made in Mexico and China where the govermentt doesn't mind killing it's own citizens. I'm sure unregulated lithium is similar, but that is irrelevent to THIS article and lithium isn't particularly toxic compared to carcinogenic plastic byproducts, expecailly as Lithium Manganese-DiOxide in disposable batteries. Please a little perspective.
- {*ANY neocon POS canclaim that so I would like to prove it by my daily radio listening: [1] Rachel Maddow, Stacy Taylor (local guy), Al Franken, Ed Schultz (sometimes, he's a Hilary/Leiberman kiss ass), Rhandi Rhodes, Mike Malloy (my favourite), and then a little blog hopping like [2], [3], [4], and [5].}