User talk:Jyim4695: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:05, 27 April 2015

Welcome!

Hello, Jyim4695, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 20:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks Janet!

JMDoran (talk) 17:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jyim4695/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 20:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 20:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Topics

-Edit page on the Angelus Temple -Create page for Lucy Farrow -Edit "Legacy" section for the Azusa Street Mission

Edit page: Aimee Semple McPherson

Sources:

"The Foursquare Gospel of Aimee Semple McPherson" by Kristy Maddux "Aimee Semple McPherson and the Resurrection of Christian America" by Matthew Avery Sutton

The WIkipedia article

I plan on editing the article so the information is more condensed and focused. The two sources listed above will help me solidify the information and ensure that the summaries are accurate and contextualized.

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 == Edit page: Aimee Semple McPherson ==
+Sources:
-Articles:
-http://www.foursquare.org/about/aimee_semple_mcpherson
+"The Foursquare Gospel of Aimee Semple McPherson" by Kristy Maddux
-http://www.smithsonianmag.com/ist/?next=/history/the-incredible-disappearing-evangelist-572829/
+"Aimee Semple McPherson and the Resurrection of  Christian America" by Matthew Avery Sutton
+The WIkipedia article
-http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30148022
+I plan on editing the article so the information is more condensed and focused. The two sources listed above will help me solidify the information and ensure that the summaries are accurate and contextualized.
-http://xroads.virginia.edu/~ug00/robertson/asm/front.html
-All of the information on the current Wikipedia page seems to stem from the same source. These above sources will add more references. I also plan on editing the article so the information is more condensed and focused.
-: The information on the Wikipedia page for Sister Aimee does not stem from one source, it stems from many sources. It has substantial reference to the three major academic books on Sister Aimee, which are by Blumhofer, Epstein, and Sutton. I'm not sure how you got the impression that it all comes from one source. The sources you provided above are weaker than the sources that are already on the page. I highly recommend that you start reading Sutton's book (check Canvas), and check out and start reading Epstein's book from the library. [[User:Jmdoran|JMDoran]] ([[User talk:Jmdoran|talk]]) 17:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)