User talk:147.26.87.13

October 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Alpha Tau Omega. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ðysepsion † ^{Speak your mind} 02:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Kappa Alpha Order. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ðysepsion † ^{Speak your mind} 03:00, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Kappa Sigma. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Ðysepsion † ^{Speak your mind} 03:01, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

December 2009

• The hosting organization must be wrong on "Jan. 7, 2010, will mark Texas and Alabama's eighth meeting in history; the last time was on Jan. 1, 1982, in Dallas, Texas, at the Cotton Bowl where the Longhorns defeated the Crimson Tide, 14-12." ???? Bband11th (talk) 19:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Works Progress Administration, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Works Progress Administration was changed by 147.26.87.13 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-04-01T03:26:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:26, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

September 2010

Your recent edit to the page Imaginary number appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 06:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pi Kappa Alpha has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 07:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Statistics

I reverted your edit to Statistics.

Please be more careful, as you have been cautioned above. Seriously, please use the sandbox to develop your edits, and check your drafts with a spell-checker and your grammar-checker if you have one. Then preview your edit and finally double-check the finished edit.

Thanks.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 03:48, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Physical attractiveness stereotype, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. ÐℬigXЯaɣ 10:53, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit on the page Lanval was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ducknish (talk) 02:13, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Robin Gibb. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 04:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

December 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Yoon (Korean name), you may be blocked from editing. hacky (talk) 07:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013

Hello, I'm Anaxial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Animal testing without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Anaxial (talk) 14:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013

Hello, I'm Anaxial. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Flag of the United States seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 19:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

Hello, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Richard Fremantle because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Tentinator  19:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Is Anyone Up?, you may be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 22:06, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014

Hello, I'm Razorflame. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Def Leppard— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Razorflame 23:36, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ex Machina (film)  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 04:24, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Persistent edit warring at Ex Machina

Your recent editing history at Ex Machina shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- BullRangifer (talk) 16:13, 2 May 2015 (UTC)