Jump to content

User talk:SpokesManBD: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Line 194: Line 194:
*Actually, things can be promotional without ENA intending for them to be promotional. Just because they say that the intent wasn't to promote the agency doesn't mean that it isn't promotional per Wikipedia's guidelines. If multiple editors are tagging the article for speedy deletion as promotional content (in addition to copyright issues) then that's time to stop and look to see why they're tagging it. Just because you say it's not promotional and ENA says it's not promotional doesn't mean that it ''isn't'' promotional. There's a huge, '''''huge''''' difference between publishing things off of Wikipedia and publishing things on here. Offhand a quick look at one of the articles shows that you very liberally hotlinked to the news website with various "For more" links. This is part of why the article was seen as promotional. The goal of Wikipedia is not to drive readers to ENA's website. I also noticed that it contained some buzzwords and sentences that would come across as PR speak. Here's an example: "Presently Eastern News Agency is equipped with “state of the art of modern technology “ in the pave of information superhighway and processing to inter connect through Data Call online Services to all major news agencies of the world." That sentence was written with the intent to promote ENA and like I said above, this would be fine '''on ENA's own website''', but not on an encyclopedia entry. That you cannot see the difference between the two and that you don't really seem to understand where you've done things wrong (despite multiple editors trying to help you) is pretty troubling. The fact is that despite your claims, you uploaded material that was copyrighted. Editors have told you that the website writing "no one but Wikipedia can use this" on their website is not enough, nor is simply stating on your userpage that people can use the content. I'm explicitly telling you that the material has issues with promotional material, which is part of the reason that the pages were deleted and that this will need to be fixed even if ENS gives up copyright. You will '''''not''''' be able to leave the page as it was on any of the pages that were deleted. This has been repeatedly stated to you and after almost a dozen deletions it should be pretty clear that the way that you think that copyright and promotional content on Wikipedia works is not the way it actually works. I'll flat out say it: if you keep uploading content the way you have been you '''''will''''' be blocked from editing, probably permanently if you cannot show that you understand why the pages keep getting deleted. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[User talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style="color:#19197; background:#fff;"> (｡◕‿◕｡)</span>''']] 08:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
*Actually, things can be promotional without ENA intending for them to be promotional. Just because they say that the intent wasn't to promote the agency doesn't mean that it isn't promotional per Wikipedia's guidelines. If multiple editors are tagging the article for speedy deletion as promotional content (in addition to copyright issues) then that's time to stop and look to see why they're tagging it. Just because you say it's not promotional and ENA says it's not promotional doesn't mean that it ''isn't'' promotional. There's a huge, '''''huge''''' difference between publishing things off of Wikipedia and publishing things on here. Offhand a quick look at one of the articles shows that you very liberally hotlinked to the news website with various "For more" links. This is part of why the article was seen as promotional. The goal of Wikipedia is not to drive readers to ENA's website. I also noticed that it contained some buzzwords and sentences that would come across as PR speak. Here's an example: "Presently Eastern News Agency is equipped with “state of the art of modern technology “ in the pave of information superhighway and processing to inter connect through Data Call online Services to all major news agencies of the world." That sentence was written with the intent to promote ENA and like I said above, this would be fine '''on ENA's own website''', but not on an encyclopedia entry. That you cannot see the difference between the two and that you don't really seem to understand where you've done things wrong (despite multiple editors trying to help you) is pretty troubling. The fact is that despite your claims, you uploaded material that was copyrighted. Editors have told you that the website writing "no one but Wikipedia can use this" on their website is not enough, nor is simply stating on your userpage that people can use the content. I'm explicitly telling you that the material has issues with promotional material, which is part of the reason that the pages were deleted and that this will need to be fixed even if ENS gives up copyright. You will '''''not''''' be able to leave the page as it was on any of the pages that were deleted. This has been repeatedly stated to you and after almost a dozen deletions it should be pretty clear that the way that you think that copyright and promotional content on Wikipedia works is not the way it actually works. I'll flat out say it: if you keep uploading content the way you have been you '''''will''''' be blocked from editing, probably permanently if you cannot show that you understand why the pages keep getting deleted. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[User talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style="color:#19197; background:#fff;"> (｡◕‿◕｡)</span>''']] 08:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
:*You're not really showing that you're here to learn policy- by continually trying to say that there was nothing wrong with the content and that this was all a mistake done by several editors (some of which are site administrators and many of whom have been on here for years) you're really coming across like your only intent is to promote ENA. It also makes it seem like even if the article is recreated, that you will just try to reinstate content that has already been established as inappropriate for several reasons. I can't caution you enough- you really, really need to look over the site's policies about all of this. These editors are not creating policy on the spot. These are all established guidelines. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[User talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style="color:#19197; background:#fff;"> (｡◕‿◕｡)</span>''']] 08:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
:*You're not really showing that you're here to learn policy- by continually trying to say that there was nothing wrong with the content and that this was all a mistake done by several editors (some of which are site administrators and many of whom have been on here for years) you're really coming across like your only intent is to promote ENA. It also makes it seem like even if the article is recreated, that you will just try to reinstate content that has already been established as inappropriate for several reasons. I can't caution you enough- you really, really need to look over the site's policies about all of this. These editors are not creating policy on the spot. These are all established guidelines. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[User talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style="color:#19197; background:#fff;"> (｡◕‿◕｡)</span>''']] 08:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)


Notifications

Thank you tokyogirl for your notification . We will remove the words as you indicated and shall follow the guideline. NO problem. Please allow us to upload with complete text as you guided . There will be no promotional quotes . We will remove it. Ok thanks

Revision as of 09:14, 5 May 2015

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!Template:Z129

Eastern News Agency,(ENA)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eastern News Agency,(ENA), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.billomatic.net/ena/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Eastern News Agency.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Eastern News Agency.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:ENA Head Office.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ENA Head Office.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Head Office ENA.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Head Office ENA.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Head Office ENA.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Head Office ENA.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 19:58, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ENA HEAD OFFICE.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ENA HEAD OFFICE.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 19:58, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eastern News Agency

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eastern News Agency requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.billomatic.net/ena/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 20:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. The article has now been deleted. Please don't upload any more photos that you find on the Internet or elsewhere. Photos that you find online are copyright, and we are not allowed to display them on this wiki. You should ony upload photos that you have taken yourself. Also, prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the law to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policies. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. -- Diannaa (talk) 21:53, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eastern News Agency

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eastern News Agency, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, SpokesManBD. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Eastern News Agency, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Eastern News Agency. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Eeekster (talk) 03:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


PLease let me know is everything goes well?


Would you please delete Speed Deletion Message?

The Images used in the Wikipedia for Eastern News Agency is the property of Eastern News Agency and more specifically the images are the company logo & trademark since 1968 which is ENA under Bangladesh Joint Stock Registration. There should not be any conflict or copy right issues of logos used. Please be notified . [14:07:59] Eastern News Agency ENA -: ata add kore dao

The article has been deleted as a copyright violation. Please stop re-adding this material or you will be blocked. If the copyright holder wishes to release this material to Wikipedia under license, please have them follow the instructions at WP:Consent. -- Diannaa (talk) 16:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Once again: posting a note on a Wikipedia page is not sufficient. If you want to donate the text on your website to Wikipedia you have to follow the steps that have been outlined above. --bonadea contributions talk 08:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Please note that we have completed necessary guideline and emailed necessary and please expedite. Ticket Reference : Ticket#: 2015050410008377

Speedy deletion nomination of Eastern News Agency,(ENA)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eastern News Agency,(ENA), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JZCL 15:37, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Eastern News Agency.gif

A tag has been placed on File:Eastern News Agency.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle 15:39, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eastern News Agency,(ENA)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eastern News Agency,(ENA) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from ena-news.com/?page_id=1981. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JZCL 15:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kharkiv07. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Eastern News Agency,(ENA) with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kharkiv07Talk 15:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Repeated creation of Eastern News Agency,(ENA) and similar articles. Thank you. JZCL 15:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Email Received

I received your email, but prefer to respond via the user talk interface (as I am here). I have added the ticket# from your email to the above thread at the administrators noticeboard so somebody else can verify/look into it. Hope that helps. Thanks, Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 16:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SpokesManBD. I saw your message at Talk:Eastern News Agency but am unable to help with this matter because I am not an OTRS member and do not have access to their email. -- Diannaa (talk) 19:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chris & Dianna - Thank you for your emails . We have provided all the necessary permission to publish our information to Wikipedia and also reconfirmed wikipedia that no copy right issues and wikipedia is exempted from our copyright contents www.ena-news.com. We wanted to know when you will activate the information of eastern News agency. Please note we have made everything lawful that will not hamper your point of interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.102.32.106 (talk) 06:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights and promotion

Hi! I don't see where anyone has really talked to you about the issues with copyrighted material when it comes to promotional materials. I do see where Diannaa has talked to you about copyrights, though.

The problem with copyrighted material is that most of the time the material was created to promote the topic, in this case ENA. Even if you file a ticket with Wikipedia that would give the site permission to use the copyrighted material you would still have to re-write the content to meet the site's neutrality guidelines and to make it encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a place to promote something and it's not like Linkedin where you can create a profile page to promote something and include promotional content. Promotional content is fine in places like press releases, official websites, and social media sites, but it isn't acceptable on Wikipedia- especially since ENA does not own the Wikipedia page. This is one of the things that makes Wikipedia so different from other places. A lot of people come on to Wikipedia expecting that it'll be like putting a profile up on Crunchbase or other business database type websites.

It also appears that you work for ENA, so this poses another problem. When you have a close conflict of interest it is sometimes difficult to view the subject neutrally. This is especially difficult if you typically work in a marketing department or other sort of PR work since you become very used to inserting promotional, WP:PEACOCK phrasing into everything you write. It may not be the best idea for you to write this article since you are so new to Wikipedia and you've had some issues with trying to re-add this material repeatedly. This doesn't mean that you can't edit in other ways or that you can never edit the article, but I would recommend that at the very least you refrain from adding any text or images that have been previously printed elsewhere. I also heavily recommend that you look over the basic guidelines for editing on Wikipedia since as a COI editor you will be expected to know the guidelines very, very well.

I need to warn you- continually re-adding promotional material (let alone potentially copyrighted material) can lead to you getting temporarily or permanently blocked from editing. Being unaware of the guidelines isn't entirely something that will save you, because if the attempts to re-add the promotional content are so numerous that it becomes very disruptive then you may be blocked just to make you slow down and look over guidelines. I'll post another message about all of this in a moment, but I wanted to make sure that you are aware that the problems with copyrighted material are larger than just copyright laws. It's usually just better to write everything from scratch to begin with. Heck, even when the source material is fairly neutral you will continually run into issues with editors seeing the content as promotional. I remember one case where a person's biography was very neutrally written, yet a few of us ended up having to re-write the article just because people kept coming on and challenging the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, SpokesManBD. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Notification :

Please be notified that Eastern News Agency published all articles & Notes which are not promotional. It is encyclopedic contents without a doubt. There are thousands of website like for example Xinhua News Agency they do the same, you can see there wikipedia , too. Secondly so far the issue was copy right contents and licensing issues which we rectified and permitted you to deal it. Third at this instance - we would like to inform you all the wikipedia information of Eastern News Agecny are with Reference links and External links, this is not promotional purpose. We have our own promotional people to deal with social media . The whole thing that eventually happened with your volunteers were misunderstanding.

Eastern News Agency was published since long in Wikipedia and the remarks before was in the talk page that no copyright conflict of interest . You can check earlier remarks. Also same content we enclosed orderly with Contents of Background, History, About Us , Achievement are not conflict of interest to any one and also not promotional. Its absolutely encyclopedic.

So Diana , Chris tokyogirls , bondeao , the volunteers are mentioning points are related with facts and also in general terms. Our information are fully neutral and no conflict of interest. Please activate our wikipedia sites for common interest & good cause. This is a Historic News Agency of Bangladesh since 1968 with historic achievement and world should know about it.

Thank you for understanding.

  • Actually, things can be promotional without ENA intending for them to be promotional. Just because they say that the intent wasn't to promote the agency doesn't mean that it isn't promotional per Wikipedia's guidelines. If multiple editors are tagging the article for speedy deletion as promotional content (in addition to copyright issues) then that's time to stop and look to see why they're tagging it. Just because you say it's not promotional and ENA says it's not promotional doesn't mean that it isn't promotional. There's a huge, huge difference between publishing things off of Wikipedia and publishing things on here. Offhand a quick look at one of the articles shows that you very liberally hotlinked to the news website with various "For more" links. This is part of why the article was seen as promotional. The goal of Wikipedia is not to drive readers to ENA's website. I also noticed that it contained some buzzwords and sentences that would come across as PR speak. Here's an example: "Presently Eastern News Agency is equipped with “state of the art of modern technology “ in the pave of information superhighway and processing to inter connect through Data Call online Services to all major news agencies of the world." That sentence was written with the intent to promote ENA and like I said above, this would be fine on ENA's own website, but not on an encyclopedia entry. That you cannot see the difference between the two and that you don't really seem to understand where you've done things wrong (despite multiple editors trying to help you) is pretty troubling. The fact is that despite your claims, you uploaded material that was copyrighted. Editors have told you that the website writing "no one but Wikipedia can use this" on their website is not enough, nor is simply stating on your userpage that people can use the content. I'm explicitly telling you that the material has issues with promotional material, which is part of the reason that the pages were deleted and that this will need to be fixed even if ENS gives up copyright. You will not be able to leave the page as it was on any of the pages that were deleted. This has been repeatedly stated to you and after almost a dozen deletions it should be pretty clear that the way that you think that copyright and promotional content on Wikipedia works is not the way it actually works. I'll flat out say it: if you keep uploading content the way you have been you will be blocked from editing, probably permanently if you cannot show that you understand why the pages keep getting deleted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're not really showing that you're here to learn policy- by continually trying to say that there was nothing wrong with the content and that this was all a mistake done by several editors (some of which are site administrators and many of whom have been on here for years) you're really coming across like your only intent is to promote ENA. It also makes it seem like even if the article is recreated, that you will just try to reinstate content that has already been established as inappropriate for several reasons. I can't caution you enough- you really, really need to look over the site's policies about all of this. These editors are not creating policy on the spot. These are all established guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Notifications

Thank you tokyogirl for your notification . We will remove the words as you indicated and shall follow the guideline. NO problem. Please allow us to upload with complete text as you guided . There will be no promotional quotes . We will remove it. Ok thanks

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SpokesManBD&oldid=660918982"