Jump to content

Talk:Sarvastivada: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Adding {{Unsigned}}
m WikiProject tagging & assessment
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell |1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell |1=
{{WikiProject Buddhism |class=C |importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Buddhism |class=Start |importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject South Asia |class=C |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject South Asia |class=Start |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject India |class=C |importance=Low |assess-date=May 2015}}
{{WikiProject India |class=Start |importance=Low |assess-date=May 2015}}
}}
}}



Revision as of 14:41, 7 May 2015

Untitled

Transfered from article : One of only two schools to have their written works survive..[ Which school was the second? ]

Theravadin maybe? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.166.91.92 (talkcontribs) 2006-06-20T20:43:25

This article needs references to clarify

Otherwise, it appears to be the editors interpretations only. Alien666 13:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The second was indeed the Theravada. Huifeng 02:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sarvastivada vs. Tibetan Buddhism

I don't think it's appropriate to structure the article around conjecture and an image of Tibetan monks. This clearly associates Tibetan rpactice with the subject of the article whereas it was my impression tha tin reality it seems most evidence linking Sarvastivadin texts exists in Gandhara or north of Tibet in the former Buddhist kingdoms of the Taklamakan. prat (talk) 03:21, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tibetan monks are technically from the Mulasarvastivada Nikaya (they follow the Mulasarvastivada Vinaya), and the Mulasarvastivada Nikaya has its basis in the Sarvastivadins of Mathura, so far as we know. So the Tibetan monks are technically a subdivision of Sarvastivada. The "early Buddhist schools," first and foremost, were basically vinaya lineages. Tengu800 03:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]