User talk:Angilbas: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:57, 7 May 2015

Hello and welcome. Please note the highlighting convention: the title word or title phrase is highlighted at its first appearance in an article, like this. I took care of this in Maurice Noble. Michael Hardy 16:41, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)

The Stand

Hi, regarding your "Project Blue" re-add, I took it out because I believe that was not part of the original version of the story; I tried to leave in only the plot aspects which were part of the original, Uncut, and TV versions. Let me know if you disagree, if not I will change this later. Thanks Jgm 11:50, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sugar Maple cultivars

Hi Angilbas - thanks for adding the Sugar Maple cultivars, just a quick grammar check - they don't have commas and fullstops as part of the cultivar name ;-) MPF 00:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Samurai Jack episode titles

Hi, thanks for contributing to the References in Samurai Jack. I would just like to ask anyone contributing to this page to give their opinion on whether titles or Roman numerals should be used to refer to episodes. The discussion is at Talk:References in Samurai Jack. Thanks. Jack 04:12, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Liriodendron

Hi Angilbas - do you know if anyone has ever done a botanical study of the east Florida 'ecotype'? - it would appear to me sufficiently distinct to be formally named as a separate subspecies; maybe even (given that its earlier flowering presumably makes it reproductively isolated?) a distinct species.

Also is there any possibility you might be able to persuade the photographer to release the photos under GFDL? - as it stands, the restriction "This permission does not extend to third parties" makes it illegal for wiki mirrors to display them, but the automated nature of wiki mirror formation prevents them from avoiding this.

Any chance of getting a GFDL photo of L. chinense, too? Unfortunately, there's none anywhere in my area, or I'd get one. - MPF 12:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great to see success on getting them gfdl'd! - MPF 19:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sequoia ext link

Hi Angilbas - just to let you know, I removed the ext link you'd added as they're wrong, suffering from a classic Sequoia / Sequoiadendron confusion ;-) Britain's champ Sequoia is 48m, at Bodnant in Wales - MPF 20:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:200px-Liriodendron_Tulipifera_Fruit-and-Seed.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:200px-Liriodendron_Tulipifera_Fruit-and-Seed.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:43, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:200px-Liriodendron_tulipifera_Fall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:200px-Liriodendron_tulipifera_Fall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:55, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liriodendron

Hi Angilbas - I've been thinking the page is getting a bit on the long side, and that it should (as in other similar instances) be split up into three pages, Liriodendron, Liriodendron chinense, and Liriodendron tulipifera, each covering what is relevant to the genus, and to the two species individually. Of these, the last already exists as a redirect back to Liriodendron, but that's easily changed. As you're heavily involved in the page, I thought I'd ask to see what you think first - MPF 13:00, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boof Bonser

Hi Angilbas- I'm a counselor at a summercamp in NY and I actually posted a paragraph or so about the "obsession" that my campers, and even a couple of counselors, had with the Minnesota Twins pitcher, Boof Bonser. I'm not 100% sure, but I think you were the person who edited my posting out of the article. I would really like it to be posted, because I really do find it amusing, but as this is not something that is really newsworthy, I don't have any textual or online evidence that could prove it to be true except for the fact that I see it and know it is true. So, if you could please allow me to repost it, I think it would be great for my campers to see that and it would certainly be an interesting piece of trivia for true Twin fans! I believe if you look through the editing records, the paragraph is still on the website. Thanks for any help, and also, I do understand if you cannot post it again, so do not feel obligated if you feel you're pushing the rules. 23:30, 29 Aug 2006 (UTC)

Liriodendron stamp

Hi, while I appreciate your effort in turning up the Liriodendron chinense stamp, we can't actually use it, permission or no. The problem is that "permission" is too vague - does the permission still apply when the image is used in a version that is sold, such as the German WPers have done? What about commercial sites that reuse all or part of WP content? In any case, stamps are usually not accurate representation, the stamp designers frequently tinkering so as to make the designs more attractive. You might pinging UK Wikipedians to go down to Kew and take some pics firsthand - User:Arpingstone has been known to do this for example. Stan 21:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:My home, September 2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:My home, September 2007.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Plumsmaplesandmore.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:DSCF1302.JPG. The copy called Image:DSCF1302.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 07:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Fall colors.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Fall colors.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Prince Edward Island

Just to let you know of a new WikiProject Prince Edward Island that has just been created. As you have shown an interest in the creation and editing of Prince Edward Island articles, you are cordially invited to join.SriMesh | talk 04:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Starr 070205 4085 carya pecan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Starr 070205 4085 carya pecan.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Soil WikiProject!

Thank you for your recent contribution to one of Wikipedia's soil-related articles. You may be interested in the Soil WikiProject, which aims to improve all soil related articles. You are free to join or can explore what the project is about by clicking here.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, or feel free to ask me on my talk page.

Image copyright problem with Image:Senneville tuliptree.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Senneville tuliptree.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Siska etc.

Hi; just saw your addition to the Siska, British Columbia page and, noting your interest in environment/gardening, figure you must have sme resources that discuss other points such as the range of the big-leaf maple. My main reaction is as to whether Siska really is the divide-point between coastal biome and the Interior one. To me, that's already evident at Hell's Gate or Boston Bar/North Bend; aren't there pine species there that are not found farther down the Canyon but which are part of the Interior biome? Siska seems well within the boundary, fuzzy though it is. Is the bigleaf maple a specific demaractor? And if so, I'm wondering what its range in the Pemberton-D'Arcy-Seton area is...I'm from Seton, there's maple there, just cant' recall what kind.....and re that area, have you ever heard of Xacwa7 (Hakwa') - "Indian rhubarb" I think its English name is, maybe Indian celery; it's an edible green, popular with the St'at'imc people of the Lakes, but I'm not sure of its species designation......Also, given your interest in both enbvironment and gardening, what might you have to say about BC's "deserts"? Nk'mip Desert I've got a rename proposal going for as that name seems a decided neologism related to branding efforts of the Nk'mip Winery and Resort and promotion of their "Desert Cultural Centre"; thing is another Desert Cultural Centre in Osoyoos doesn't use that name (see their site....so if that pocket desert has a name, might you know what it is? South Okanagan Desert? Thing is, it's not really desert and despite claims it's an extension of the Sonoran Desert (not made on the page, but in Nk'mip's literature) I'm unaware of any adjoining part of Washington that's called desert.....if desert's only defined by rainfall, there are other places in BC that are far drier, and hotter, than Osoyoos (Lytton for starters) but despite clear "pocket deserts" here and there none have names.....oh, except the Thompson-Nicola Regional District's new designation of the "Copper Desert Country" surrounding western Kamloops Lake. So overall, what can you tell me by way of proper definitions of the climate/biome of areas like the lower Thompson (Kamloops to Lytton) and the Fraser Canyon from Lytton to Riske Creek (Chilcotin Jctn), and about the various "alpine deserts" on hte lee of the Coast Mountains, particularly in the Stikine? Just idle curiosity from a multi-track mind, but also wanting to correct various myths, such as Osoyoos' loud claim that it is "Canada's only desert", when it's neither "only" nor really a desert.....Your thoughts?Skookum1 (talk) 15:07, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Red Maple Crimson Shadow.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Red Maple Crimson Shadow.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 14:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tyee (soil)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tyee (soil), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Poor sourcing, better to be merged with a classification article

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Seddσn ^talk|^WikimediaUK 17:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Jarry night.jpg

File:Jarry night.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Jarry night.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Jarry night.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Ranges 241209.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Ranges 241209.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:24, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:CropedIMG 0024.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:CropedIMG 0024.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Angilbas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Walter Peregoy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ECF_Liriodendron_2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ECF_Liriodendron_2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Darkwind (talk) 16:32, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maple decline

The article Maple decline has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is an article about a tree disease that isn't real. Several people have posted on the talk page over the years about how the article is bunk. It has no sources (just one broken external link). It has a bunch of "scare quotes" implying terms are unreliable or suspect but not giving any reason why. If I were to eliminate everything that's problematic in this article, it would be empty. So I propose deletion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Janus303 (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crowonwires.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Crowonwires.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 22:58, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Halloweenmaples.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Halloweenmaples.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:29, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Liriodendron chinense may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:39, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ECF Liriodendron.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ECF Liriodendron.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:58, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Lake Worth Liriodendron.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lake Worth Liriodendron.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Liriodendron and Roystonea.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Liriodendron and Roystonea.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:42, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Caution Aggressive Nesting Crows sign.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bugsy and Mugsy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bugsy and Mugsy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bugsy and Mugsy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 12:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lazo Wildlife Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wilhelm Canaris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James P. Hogan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Carl Oberg may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* {{cite journal | title = Sparing the Butcher's Life | date = 5 May 1958 | journal = Time | url=http://

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited La Plata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Valdivia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palms. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dubakella (Soil), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Serpentine and Grass Valley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Acer rubrum

I clicked the link you added on Acer rubrum and it seemed to try to load Google.ca maps, but redirected to a broken Google.ca search page. I don't know exactly why. I just wanted to explain further. Deunanknute (talk) 23:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Google street views as references

Due to Wikipedia's policy against publishing original research, I'm not convinced that the Google Street View links you recently added to the Grass Valley, California article are useful as citations. If the purpose of these links is merely to provide illustrations the different soil types, it might be better to persuade a photographer to take photos specifically for that purpose and upload the media files to Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons.—Stepheng3 (talk) 23:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John E. Pearce Provincial Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+Hello and welcome.  Please note the highlighting convention: the title
-Penises
+word or title phrase is highlighted at its first appearance in an
+article, like '''this'''.  I took care of this in [[Maurice Noble]]. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 16:41, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 == The Stand ==