Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine Fairley: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:19, 8 May 2015

Madeleine Fairley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress Fails GNG - Considering she's been in 2 very notable films (Kidulthood and Adulthood) I'm very surprised there's nothing on her - I managed to find one source which I've added but other than that I can't find anything - Even looked on Highbeam but got nothing.[1] –Davey2010^Talk 17:20, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010^Talk 17:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010^Talk 17:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010^Talk 17:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She is notable enough to warrant inclusion here. That she is included in the International Movie Database and is well known enough that Google has given her a recognition box under her name sufficiently establishes notability. Ormr2014 (talk) 23:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ormr2014 - IMDb isn't a reliable source and having a "recognition box" means bugger all thus your !vote as it stands is invalid, Please provide legitimate sources that establish notability. –Davey2010^Talk 01:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Davey2010 You should do some research instead of simply nominating the article for deletion. [2]. There is more than enough material readily available to anyone with even the slightest inclination to look. Even you admit that she was in "2 very notable films" Ormr2014 | Talk

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 '''Keep''' She is notable enough to warrant inclusion here. That she is included in the [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1932097/ International Movie Database] and is well known enough that Google has given her a recognition box under her name sufficiently establishes notability. [[User:Ormr2014|Ormr2014]] ([[User talk:Ormr2014|talk]]) 23:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 :{{u|Ormr2014}} - IMDb isn't a reliable source and having a "recognition box" means bugger all thus your !vote as it stands is invalid, Please provide legitimate sources that establish notability. –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 01:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
-::{{u|Davey2010}} You should do some research instead of simply nominating the article for deletion. [https://www.google.com/search?q=Madeleine+Fairley&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8]. There is more than enough material readily available to anyone with even the slightest inclination to look.<small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;">[[User:Ormr2014|<b> Ormr2014</b>]] |[[User_talk:Ormr2014|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background: #8C001A;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small>
+::{{u|Davey2010}} You should do some research instead of simply nominating the article for deletion. [https://www.google.com/search?q=Madeleine+Fairley&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8]. There is more than enough material readily available to anyone with even the slightest inclination to look. Even you admit that she was in "2 very notable films" <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;">[[User:Ormr2014|<b> Ormr2014</b>]] |[[User_talk:Ormr2014|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background: #8C001A;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small>