Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine Fairley

Madeleine Fairley

Madeleine Fairley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress Fails GNG - Considering she's been in 2 very notable films (Kidulthood and Adulthood) I'm very surprised there's nothing on her - I managed to find one source which I've added but other than that I can't find anything - Even looked on Highbeam but got nothing.[1] –Davey2010^Talk 17:20, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010^Talk 17:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010^Talk 17:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010^Talk 17:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Keep She is notable enough to warrant inclusion here. That she is included in the International Movie Database and is well known enough that Google has given her a recognition box under her name sufficiently establishes notability. Ormr2014 (talk) 23:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Ormr2014 - IMDb isn't a reliable source and having a "recognition box" means bugger all thus your !vote as it stands is invalid, Please provide legitimate sources that establish notability. –Davey2010^Talk 01:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Discussion about sources

Davey2010 You should do some research instead of simply nominating the article for deletion. [2]. There is more than enough material readily available to anyone with even the slightest inclination to look. Even you admit that she was in "2 very notable films". Regarding your assertion about the IMDB, you cannot even have a page on there without having some level of verifiable notability. Ormr2014 | Talk  Ormr2014 - Are you completely blind as if you look above you will see I have searched on 2 sites and 30+pages, Those Google Results are all irrelevant - Don't you think if they were relevant I would've used them?!, IMDb isn't a reliable source whatsoever - IMDb is free to edit like Wikipedia so it's not a source, Again invalid vote - As I said right above Please provide legitimate sources that establish notability which so far you haven't done. –Davey2010Talk 02:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Davey2010 I'm not blind at all. And as for what you would or wouldn't do, I don't have a clue, but I do see a lot of people proposing to delete all sorts of things that really have no business being deleted and from my perspective, this is such a case. Ormr2014 | Talk  Ormr2014 - Well I'm hardly gonna lie about looking am I ... As you'll see from my edits here[3] I actually planned on sourcing it but how can one source an article if there is none? ...., If they don't meet notability requirements they have every right to be deleted, I would thank you on providing sources but you've not listed any which clearly indicates you haven't or can't find anything so thus proves my point - No evidence of notability to warrant an article. –Davey2010Talk 02:40, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Davey2010 How's This: Filmography Kidulthood (2006) as Claire Adulthood (2008) as Dude Wheres Gary's Finger (2010) as Gaz 'Fingertron' Hardy Television work Drake And Josh (2004; 1 episode) as Mandy Casualty (2008; 1 episode) as Amber Collins West 10 LDN (2008) (television series pilot) as Lillian Missing (2009; 1 episode) as Kaz Gutenburg Project TCM outlines her filmography Listed on Theiapolis Mentioned in the book, The Nicholas Hoult Handbook Simply searching "Madeleine Fairley" pulls up over 5,000 results While many are certainly not worth listing, many are relevant. There is more than enough to deem this article "notable". That her filmography includes not only two major motion pictures and a smaller film, but also spans 4 television programs establishes enough "notability" to be encyclopedic. How you cannot see this is beyond me. Ormr2014 | Talk  1st is a Wikipedia mirror, 2 and 3 aren't reliable sources, 4 doesn't work and again 5 is useless ... so again no notability, Please read WP:Reliable sources, With all respect I've been here 2-3 years so I know alot more than you ..... Give up and !vote Delete it'll save us both time. –Davey2010Talk 03:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC) I've found the the book but it looks to have mostly been copied from here and elsewhere so again not really source. –Davey2010Talk 03:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Actually,User:Davey2010, I've been editing on Wikipedia for over 5 years under 3 different accounts, so I'm going to disagree with you on the last point. And as for this article, I've said my piece and I'm going to leave it at that. Others can decide whether or not to include it here... Ormr2014 | Talk  — Preceding undated comment added 11:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)