User talk:Marluigio

DYK

Hi, mind if I nominate Tachikawa air disaster for DYK? Thanks, Matty.007 19:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

And 1951 Atlantic C-124 disappearance? (Note: if I don't get a reply in the negative by 13 September/14 September, I will nominate the first page for DYK, the second on 14/15, as otherwise they will become ineligible. Thanks, Matty.007 16:27, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello STH235SilverLover, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. Please bear in mind that we are all people (except for the bots), even I am a person. As such, please treat us all with respect.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page, or ask ata the Teahouse, a collection of experienced editors.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents

• Department directory

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
• The Teahouse - a good place to ask questions, your queries will be answered by an experienced editor
• Adopt-a-user - consider getting adopted, that is, getting an experienced editor to help you around

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia
• The step by step way to edit - a guide on how to edit, starting with the very basics
• Develop an article - help an article go from a stub class article to something more

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Getting started:

• Requested articles - a list of articles requested by other users
• FAQs - a list of questions that many new editors have before they start to edit
• The perfect article - a list of things which the perfect Wikipedia article contains

• Tips - a list of links to important pages about starting editing
• A tutorial - another guide on how to edit

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

• The Sandbox is useful if you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills. You have your own, personal one, located here

Welcome! Here, have a plate of fresh cookies

You are now a Registered Editor, and entitled to display this Service Badge.

STH235SilverLover, good luck, and have fun. – Matty.007 19:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities

Great job on the new articles you created. It's great to see them added to the list. I wanted to give you a heads-up that I undid two of your changes: Delta 191 and Eastern 401. You added two more fatalities to each accident but because they did not occur immediatley after the crash, the NTSB reports for both accidents ruled them as non-fatal deaths. I know this is a bit of an oxymoron, but it keeps the numbers standardized across the board. Thanks-Godot13 (talk) 04:58, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Tachikawa air disaster

Gatoclass (talk) 00:07, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for 1951 Atlantic C-124 disappearance

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Change.org may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• unless they were posted on Google+. So far, the petition has received over 25,000 signatures.<ref>[https://www.change.org/petitions/google-change-the-youtube-comment-section-back-to-its-original-
• google-change-the-youtube-comment-section-back-to-its-original-form#|publisher= Change.Org}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:44, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

1976 Zagreb mid-air collision

I suppose it makes a bit of a change from drive-by anons making the change without explanation, but please can you explain why you have changed the type of aircraft to a -31 when the sources clearly state it's a -32? Pinkbeast (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Some say it's a -31, others say it's a -32. Although I never cited it, Aviation Safety Network is what I used as an info source when I made that change. See, when I work on articles relating to aviation mishaps, I usually use ASN as my primary source of info—though I vehemently disagree with ASN on the subject American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 (the airplanes that were hijacked and crashed into the Twin Towers in 9/11) being the two worst "accidents" on U.S. soil and/or involving the Boeing 767 (those distinctions rightfully go to American Airlines Flight 191 and Lauda Air Flight 004, respectively). --STH235SilverLover (talk) 02:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

... and presumably there's an even chance that it's always Aviation Safety Network or the book it refers to, which explains why every n months someone else comes by to make the same edit. Ha.

The AAIB report consistently has it as a -32. If http://www.planespotters.net/Production_List/McDonnell-Douglas/DC-9/47649,YU-AJR-Inex-Adria-Airways.php is to be believed (I don't know if that's an RS, but it forms part of a consistent whole), it was built as a -31 in '74 and modified to a -32 in March '76, which is consistent with the AAIB report listing an export license date of MArch 1976. Pinkbeast (talk) 03:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm Jetstreamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cubana de Aviación Flight 9646, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:58, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to 2012 Aéro-Service Ilyushin Il-76T crash, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

References needed

G'day from Oz. I have just looked at 1968 Kham Duc C-130 shootdown; you have listed two book pages as references but you have not mentioned the books themselves. Could you please add them when you get a chance (see the References section of Lockheed L-188 Electra as an example). Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 01:04, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Article creation templates

A wide variety of standardised templteat for creating aviationarticles (including aircraft accidents/incidents etc.) can be found at Template:WPAVIATION creator

Happy editting--Petebutt (talk) 16:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1940 Deutsche Lufthansa Ju 90 crash, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Icing and Berlin Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 1979 Dniprodzerzhynsk mid-air collision. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

• Oh, for the love of...! Didn't the pages I edited have sufficient sources already? --STH235SilverLover (talk) 01:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Do not violate WP:NOTAFORUM again. You haven been warned many times, and yet you continue to use talk pages as a forum for voicing your personal opinions. Any more of this will get you a block. Only use talk pages to discuss editing an article. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 16:16, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

• OK, OK, I get the message! Jeez, it's not like I committing such violations INTENTIONALLY, y'know! --STH235SilverLover (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

You were warned multiple times to stop, so I don't know how you can claim it was accidental. But regardless, now you know, so hopefully we won't have any more troubles. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 22:07, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Asiana Airlines Flight 214, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Removal of valid content without an edit summary is often considered vandalism Robert McClenon (talk) 10:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Content needs to be well-sourced. Also, content should not go in the LEAD unless it is already in the article. - MrX 18:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Pan Am Flight 843 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pan Am Flight 843 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pan Am Flight 843 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. YSSYguy (talk) 09:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Please see my comments at AfD. Mjroots (talk) 17:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

Please do not remove large amounts of sourced information, as you did in this edit. If you're going to make a massive change to an article and its scope of what it covers, its usually be best to discuss beforehand on the talk page, and only make the change if there is consensus to do so. You didn't even bother to explain through an edit summary.

It looks like you've been warned about this sort of thing in the past. Please start taking these warnings seriously, or you may be blocked from editing. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

• This edit is exactly the same sort of thing I was warning you about last February. Don't remove large amounts of sourced content without explanation. This is the last warning on this - next time you will be blocked from editing. Sergecross73 msg me 12:25, 12 May 2015 (UTC)