Jump to content

User talk:Prof2012: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Prof2012 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Prof2012 (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Changes to Ursula Appolloni's wiki page==
==Changes to Ursula Appolloni's wiki page==
{{Help me}} I wish to understand why EncyclopediaUpdaticus continually re-inserts the sentence, "she was a smoker and that family asked her to stop ...etc." (or something to that effect). This insertion immaterial and detracts from the factual basis of the rest of her page. I am her son, I should ass and the insertion is also not fully accurate, as only one member of the family requested her to quit.
{{Help me}} I wish to understand why EncyclopediaUpdaticus continually re-inserts the sentence, "she was a smoker and that family asked her to stop ...etc." (or something to that effect). This insertion is immaterial and detracts from the factual basis of the rest of her page. I am her son, I should add, and the insertion is also not fully accurate, as only one member of the family requested her to quit.


==File permission problem with File:Stephen Scharper, Toronto Photo at Home.jpg==
==File permission problem with File:Stephen Scharper, Toronto Photo at Home.jpg==

Revision as of 14:41, 12 May 2015

Changes to Ursula Appolloni's wiki page

I wish to understand why EncyclopediaUpdaticus continually re-inserts the sentence, "she was a smoker and that family asked her to stop ...etc." (or something to that effect). This insertion is immaterial and detracts from the factual basis of the rest of her page. I am her son, I should add, and the insertion is also not fully accurate, as only one member of the family requested her to quit.

File permission problem with File:Stephen Scharper, Toronto Photo at Home.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stephen Scharper, Toronto Photo at Home.jpg, which you've attributed to Hilary Cunningham Scharper. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 00:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello Prof2012, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Prof2012, good luck, and have fun. --Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:30, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation

Teahouse logo
Hello! Prof2012, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Hilary Cunningham Scharper, Prof2012!

Wikipedia editor Barney the barney barney just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

helpful.

To reply, leave a comment on Barney the barney barney's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Stephen Bede Scharper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Bede Scharper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Bede Scharper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Suttungr (talk) 18:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]