Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayyed Ibn Tawus: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Papeli44 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:
:::{{ping|Anders Feder}}Please read the article and then talk in this page. I added more information about Ibn Tawus name. I reed the [[WP:PEACOCK]] and know about it. Also, I explained that all problems solved. I think you have more problem with topic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![[User:Papeli44|Papeli44]] ([[User talk:Papeli44|talk]]) 10:49, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Anders Feder}}Please read the article and then talk in this page. I added more information about Ibn Tawus name. I reed the [[WP:PEACOCK]] and know about it. Also, I explained that all problems solved. I think you have more problem with topic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![[User:Papeli44|Papeli44]] ([[User talk:Papeli44|talk]]) 10:49, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
::::Please take a basic course in human social skills. You are clearly incompetent.--[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] ([[User talk:Anders Feder|talk]]) 11:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
::::Please take a basic course in human social skills. You are clearly incompetent.--[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] ([[User talk:Anders Feder|talk]]) 11:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
::::You can think that I am incompetent but I think you are .......[[User:Papeli44|Papeli44]] ([[User talk:Papeli44|talk]]) 11:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Iraq|list of Iraq-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Iraq|list of Iraq-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Islam|list of Islam-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Islam|list of Islam-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 11:27, 18 May 2015

Sayyed Ibn Tawus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. While the subject of this article may be notable, the entire article violates WP:PEACOCK and falls short of a neutral position. The following sentences illustrate what I am talking about:

  • Sayyed Ibn Tawus (Arabic: سید ابن طاووس) was a prominent Shiite jurist
  • He was famous for meeting the twelfth Shiite imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi who according to Shiite was/ is living in occultation.
  • He is also famous for his library and his numerous works
  • One of his forefathers was a handsome man with ugly legs
  • His famous children were known by the name of their mother.
  • When Hulagu Khan conquered Baghdad, it is famous that he asked the Scholars of the city
  • It is famous that Ibn Tawus had direct contact with Muhammad al-Mahdi
 Ormr2014 | Talk   15:45, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - WP:PEACOCK is not a reason for to propose AfD. Notability is what we are looking for - it seems there are suitable sources for notability. МандичкаYO 😜 15:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The subject of the article appears to be notable. I would guess that the editor(s) who created the article used peacock terms to demonstrate that the subject of the article was notable. Whilst that was a stylistic error, the error is correctable.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In order for this article to meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion, it would require a complete rewrite. In such cases, despite the notability of the subject matter, deletion is completely acceptable (See Starting from Scratch).
The use of Peacock terminology does not substantiate notability and even if that were the intent of the author, it still violates WP:Peacock. Ormr2014 | Talk  16:38, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Articles that require complete rewrite are not necessarily suitable for deletion; they are suitable for rewrite. If you see an article that is clearly WP:PEACOCK, the action you should take is to rewrite the text or least just tag it. Please see WP:BEFORE. МандичкаYO 😜 17:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone who speaks Persian please explain this user that WP:PEACOCK has nothing to do with the subject's name; nor does confusing and/or pretending to confuse the two things repeatedly make him any more or less notable.--Anders Feder (talk) 09:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Anders Feder:Please read the article and then talk in this page. I added more information about Ibn Tawus name. I reed the WP:PEACOCK and know about it. Also, I explained that all problems solved. I think you have more problem with topic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Papeli44 (talk) 10:49, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please take a basic course in human social skills. You are clearly incompetent.--Anders Feder (talk) 11:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You can think that I am incompetent but I think you are .......Papeli44 (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]