Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokyo Tower of Babel: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}


:{{la|Tokyo Tower of Babel}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokyo Tower of Babel|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 13#{{anchorencode:Tokyo Tower of Babel}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tokyo_Tower_of_Babel Stats]</span>)
:{{la|Tokyo Tower of Babel}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokyo Tower of Babel|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 20#{{anchorencode:Tokyo Tower of Babel}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tokyo_Tower_of_Babel Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|Tokyo Tower of Babel}})
:({{Find sources AFD|Tokyo Tower of Babel}})
This does not seem like a particularly [[WP:N|notable]] idea. Only reference is clearly not an [[WP:RS|reliable source]], more like a clickbait-blog page. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 19:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
This does not seem like a particularly [[WP:N|notable]] idea. Only reference is clearly not an [[WP:RS|reliable source]], more like a clickbait-blog page. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 19:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:04, 20 May 2015

Tokyo Tower of Babel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not seem like a particularly notable idea. Only reference is clearly not an reliable source, more like a clickbait-blog page. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a page about it on the Japanese Wikipedia [1] that has a source (though its author seems to be the designer of the proposed tower). Designing the tallest building ever proposed would be a notable idea, though maybe not enough for a notable article. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 20:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]