Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokyo Tower of Babel: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Listing at WP:DELSORT under Baseball (FWDS) |
m Reverted edits by Mellowed Fillmore (talk) to last version by DAJF |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Delete'''. Lacks any in-depth coverage or third-party to demonstrate sufficient notability. --[[User:DAJF|DAJF]] ([[User talk:DAJF|talk]]) 13:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Lacks any in-depth coverage or third-party to demonstrate sufficient notability. --[[User:DAJF|DAJF]] ([[User talk:DAJF|talk]]) 13:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Baseball|list of Baseball-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Mellowed Fillmore|Mellowed Fillmore]] ([[User talk:Mellowed Fillmore|talk]]) 04:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)</small> |
Revision as of 05:53, 26 May 2015
- Tokyo Tower of Babel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This does not seem like a particularly notable idea. Only reference is clearly not an reliable source, more like a clickbait-blog page. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- There is a page about it on the Japanese Wikipedia [1] that has a source (though its author seems to be the designer of the proposed tower). Designing the tallest building ever proposed would be a notable idea, though maybe not enough for a notable article. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 20:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as no reliable, third party sources provided which establish notability. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:04, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Lacks any in-depth coverage or third-party to demonstrate sufficient notability. --DAJF (talk) 13:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)