Jump to content

User talk:Kevin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MadmanBot (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Kevin/Archive 7) (bot
Line 55: Line 55:
A year ago, you were the 423rd recipient of my [[User talk:PumpkinSky|PumpkinSky]] Prize, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 20:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
A year ago, you were the 423rd recipient of my [[User talk:PumpkinSky|PumpkinSky]] Prize, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 20:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Two years ago, you were the 423rd recipient of my '''[[User:PumpkinSky|<span style="color:orange;">Pumpkin</span>]][[User talk:PumpkinSky|Sky]]''' [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/PumpkinSky Prize|Prize]], --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Two years ago, you were the 423rd recipient of my '''[[User:PumpkinSky|<span style="color:orange;">Pumpkin</span>]][[User talk:PumpkinSky|Sky]]''' [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/PumpkinSky Prize|Prize]], --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

== Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians ==

You have been mentioned at [[Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians]]. X[[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 08:33, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

==Invitation to Adelaide Wikipedia Users Group meetings==
{{Wikipedia:Meetup/Adelaide/Invite2}}
Hi, in case you're not already aware of it, a group of Adelaide Wikipedians has been meeting on a monthly basis [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Adelaide|since April]], with the aim of improving the scope and quality of articles on South Australian topics. We meet at UniSA's City West campus, and our [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Adelaide/Meetup 11|23 July meeting]] will have a guest speaker from the National Trust of SA.

This coming Sunday, 6 July, we will be holding [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Adelaide/Edit-a-thon 1|our first Edit-a-thon]]. This will be an opportunity for new editors to come and learn either basic or more advanced editing from very experienced wikipedians, so if you know anyone who would like to get some practice, please let them know - and beginners will be very welcome. Cheers, [[User:Bahudhara|Bahudhara]] ([[User talk:Bahudhara|talk]]) 05:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==
==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==

Revision as of 02:50, 1 June 2015

Please note that if you post something for me here, I'll respond to it here.

If I posted on your talk page, I have it watched so you can reply there. It just makes for easier reading. Thanks.

Are you certain?

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Permissions#Kevin.40enwiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avraham (talkcontribs)

John Avlon marketing his book.

Hi,

So I noticed a sentence in the "radical center" wiki with no citation.

The definitive history of "Centrism" in America, and probably the best-selling radical centrist book to date[citation needed], is John Avlon's Independent Nation (2004, pbk. 2005).

I was unaware that sales figures were kept for "radical centrist" publications, so I did some searching for a top 10 list of radical centrists books by various years (2009, 2008, 2007 etc..). Unfortunately, I was unable to find such a list.

So, I removed the sentence. Then I went to John Avlon's wiki to remove the following sentence, which cites as its source the sentence in the "radical center" wiki that has no citation!

Independent Nation has been called, "the definitive history of 'Centrism' in America, and probably the best-selling radical centrist book to date."

Unfortunately, I'm a newbie so I can't change the page. I imagine there were some "angry" edits made in the past few months which is why the page is protected. Nevertheless, the above sentence strikes me as pure unsupported marketing which shouldn't have a place on a factual bio page.

Cheers!

Important Notice: Your 2013 Arbitration Committee Election vote

Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis

Precious again

biographies of living persons
Thank you for taking care of the correct sourcing for BLPs, with care and attention, patience and diligence, and for treating editors as living persons, following the spirit of policy rather than letter, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 423rd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC) Two years ago, you were the 423rd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]