Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pod Delusion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Hithladaeus (talk | contribs) →The Pod Delusion: del celebrity associations got a burst of press, but not notability |
Delete |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom - I can't find anything and it looks like it's no longer running, most recent editions were in August 2014 and April 2014 [[User:Wikimandia|<font color="#0066cc">—'''''Мандичка'''''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Wikimandia|<font color="#6600cc">'''''YO'''''</font>]]</sup> 😜 12:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nom - I can't find anything and it looks like it's no longer running, most recent editions were in August 2014 and April 2014 [[User:Wikimandia|<font color="#0066cc">—'''''Мандичка'''''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Wikimandia|<font color="#6600cc">'''''YO'''''</font>]]</sup> 😜 12:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''': A minor podcast that benefited from celebrity association and Rolodex journalism. It didn't remain or have effects that led to discussion and a need for an article. [[User:Hithladaeus|Hithladaeus]] ([[User talk:Hithladaeus|talk]]) 12:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''': A minor podcast that benefited from celebrity association and Rolodex journalism. It didn't remain or have effects that led to discussion and a need for an article. [[User:Hithladaeus|Hithladaeus]] ([[User talk:Hithladaeus|talk]]) 12:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete or move to [[List of skeptical podcasts]]''' (as an alternative to deletion and preserve the current article) - All my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing significant aside from a few [http://www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm=The+Pod+Delusion+podcast Highbeam] results. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">SwisterTwister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 17:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:59, 2 June 2015
- The Pod Delusion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems time for this one to go, a PROD template was previously removed but the article relies entirely on a 1 minute appearance on the BBC's "Click" and a couple of awards from Skeptic magazine. The awards seem to be minor and I can find no other evidence the podcast has received significant coverage from any news sources. Fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 14:00, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 12:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 12:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - I can't find anything and it looks like it's no longer running, most recent editions were in August 2014 and April 2014 —МандичкаYO 😜 12:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: A minor podcast that benefited from celebrity association and Rolodex journalism. It didn't remain or have effects that led to discussion and a need for an article. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete or move to List of skeptical podcasts (as an alternative to deletion and preserve the current article) - All my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing significant aside from a few Highbeam results. SwisterTwister talk 17:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)