User talk:Yashthepunisher: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:02, 8 June 2015

October 2014

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Vikram Bhatt, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 14:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anurag Kashyap may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

case|Sanjeev Nanda BMW hit-and-run case]] and [[DPS MMS Scandal|MMS scandal]] in [[Dev.D]]'' (2009)) and portrayal of real life gang wars that took place in the region of [[Dhanbad]]'',[[Jharkhand]]''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anurag kashyap filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anurag Kashyap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Anurag Kashyap

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anurag Kashyap you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kailash29792 -- Kailash29792 (talk) 15:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anurag Kashyap filmography

Thanks for the offer, but I will only get back to major editing by June 2015 as per my talk page. So, I have to decline this one. Sorry. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the oppose votes at the FLC nomination, I'm suggesting that you should withdraw the nom and work on it. I myself had to do this with Akshay Kumar filmography. This is not what you wanted to hear but based on present circumstances there is no chance that this will be passed in the first attempt. Regards, --Skr15081997 (talk) 16:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I second Skr15081997's advice. -- FrankBoy _CHITCHAT 20:58, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood

Since the article about Hindi cinema currently sits at Bollywood, I see no reason for justification of your edits. —Vensatry _(ping) 13:54, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please stop and gain consensus. It seems to me that Bollywood is no more regressive than Hollywood. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Anurag Kashyap filmography/archive1, you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:59, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Anurag Kashyap

The article Anurag Kashyap you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anurag Kashyap for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kailash29792 -- Kailash29792 (talk) 07:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For bringing the article Anurag Kashyap to GA status with a great level of patience and hardwork. Keep it up! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, congratulations Yash on your first GA. You can create your userpage and use it as a gallery of your achievements and awards received. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both of you. Sure I will. Yashthepunisher (talk) 5:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

PR

Next time when you open something for a peer review, do remember to do this task, and don't worry it'll be an FL. -- FrankBoy _CHITCHAT 17:09, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't knew that. Its my first time, so please help in withdrawing the nom. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking about the peer review, and not withdrawing. Whenever you list an article for peer review, do this in the talk page. Anyways you do not need to do anything else for withdrawing. Just wait and the featured list director or a delegate will close it. Now you have to do is wait for the reviewers' comments at peer, and later renominate it for the FLC. Hopefully it will be soon an FL. I have posted comments at the peer review. -- FrankBoy _CHITCHAT 20:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for clarifying, but i'm not against your edits, I am just clarifying that the removal contents are really unnecessary, so i just asked to someone. Hetika (talk) 16:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Her school is still mentioned: "Mehta was educated at the Carmel Convent School"... Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

but not "Sacred Heart Convent school". Hetika (talk) 17:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 16:55, 8 June 2015 edit Yashthepunisher (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 22,138 edits →Thanks ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:02, 8 June 2015 edit undo Hetika (talk \| contribs) 839 edits →Thanks: re Next edit →
Line 65:		Line 65:

	Her school is still mentioned: "Mehta was educated at the Carmel Convent School"... [[User:Yashthepunisher\|Yashthepunisher]] ([[User talk:Yashthepunisher\|talk]]) 16:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)		Her school is still mentioned: "Mehta was educated at the Carmel Convent School"... [[User:Yashthepunisher\|Yashthepunisher]] ([[User talk:Yashthepunisher\|talk]]) 16:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

			::but not "Sacred Heart Convent school". [[User:Hetika\|Hetika]] ([[User talk:Hetika\|talk]]) 17:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)