Talk:El Clásico: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:58, 9 June 2015

Football: Spain C‑class Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Spanish football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Spain C‑class Mid‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

El Clásico received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

The user "Xeerow" commits vandalism

This user repeatedly edits the page to write that Barcelona has the most official wins with 107.

As he knows, that's a false information, but he still edits it repeatedly. Cid Campeador3

1960/61 European Cup

@Carlos Rojas77:, I feel like you are a reliable editor and seem pretty unbiased. Over the next few days, I am going to start a new section in the article about the 1960/61 European Cup (which is a very big part of the El Clasico rivaly). Please cross check references, and act as a general proof reader. Thanks. Imperial HRH2 (talk) 22:07, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You won't need me to check for the validity of the references. Just avoid tabloids (red tops mainly) and blogs. Most published sources are fine, plus as I don't think the games were contentious (not that I'm aware of anyway) then using Marca, AS and other reliable Spanish sources are also fine.Carlos Rojas77 (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My sources include the Guardian among other. And I might even go ahead and quote your favourite bloke Sid Lowe while I'm at it. By the way, we probably need to semi-protect this page to stop people messing with the 11-1 article.

Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2015

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

head to head

real madrid wins

71+12+6+3='92'

222.112.86.66 (talk) 04:26, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 05:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has now been corrected and shows the correct results. Thanks. Imperial HRH2 (talk) 08:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Viewership

This article Is Messi vs. Ronaldo Bigger Than The Super Bowl? makes a pretty compelling case that the viewership claims of 400 million all track back to a single source which did not claim actual viewership, but potential viewership, and that the actual number is probably between 50 - 150 million. I'm a little hesitant to start an edit war, because I believe that there are lots of "reliable sources" that back up the 400 million number, but they all appear to be wrong. Rks13 (talk) 21:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not the most reliable of sources, however upon reading I do concur with much of it (besides using Internet search engine as some sort of comparison as a chunk of viewers (namely in Asia and Africa) won't have Internet access afforded to those in the West). It does mirror superbowl inflation as 400 mill for the Clasico was a figure I was never convinced of (tho went along with the reliable sources per wiki policy).. Carlos Rojas77 (talk) 15:15, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I also agree. I likewise am distrustful of the methodology used by FiveThirtyEight as far as providing an accurate number; nevertheless, we clearly can't put 400,000,000. (I especially like "Wikipedia, which cites Forbes, which cites CNN, which cites no one" from that article.) Red Slash 16:13, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2015

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change the wording "Real Madrid leads Barcelona 79-78 in terms of overall trophies" to "Barcelona leads Real Madrid 80-79 in terms of overall trophies". Barcelona has already won La Liga and Copa del Rey in 2015. Also, the Championship table needs to be updated to reflect the current trophies won by Barcelona. 199.64.7.53 (talk) 14:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you Adnan (talk) 19:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Real non-sense! How could I miss it!

I don't know how? But how come Alfonso Albéniz have transfer from Barca to Madrid in 1902 and 1911 as well? Either of two is wrong! Else there should be entry of his name in the list below!
Explicitely saying "Please delete the entry Alfonso Albéniz against the year 1911. 1902–03 Real Madrid C.F. season states that the player was in Real Madrid in 1903! Valid citation is present over there.
117.212.138.158 (talk) 03:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 June 2015

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at El Clásico. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Please change the wording "Barcelona leads Real Madrid 80-79 in terms of overall trophies" to "Barcelona leads Real Madrid 81-79 in terms of overall trophies". Barcelona has already won UEFA in 2015. 199.64.7.55 (talk) 16:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Good that you notified! Avani ❝ Want to say something? Go On!❞ 03:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 <!-- End request -->
 [[Special:Contributions/199.64.7.55|199.64.7.55]] ([[User talk:199.64.7.55|talk]]) 16:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
-:{{done}}[[User:Avani97|<span style="font-family:AVP; color:#ff0000;">Avani</span>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Avani97|<span style=" font-size:90%; font-family:Century Gothic; color:#FF6666" >&#10077; Want to say something? Go On!&#10078;</span>]] 03:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
+:{{done}} Good that you notified! [[User:Avani97|<span style="font-family:AVP; color:#ff0000;">Avani</span>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Avani97|<span style=" font-size:90%; font-family:Century Gothic; color:#FF6666" >&#10077; Want to say something? Go On!&#10078;</span>]] 03:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)