Eligible bachelor: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m clean up using AWB |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
By Colin McDowell</ref> and [[Prince William, Duke of Cambridge|Prince William]]. |
By Colin McDowell</ref> and [[Prince William, Duke of Cambridge|Prince William]]. |
||
[[Jane Austen]]'s novels are often concerned with the heroine's relationship with an eligible bachelor. Jane Austen's ''[[Emma (novel)|Emma]]'' particularly concerns a woman's attempt to obtain a husband for her friend by embellishing the truth. The gentleman in that case sees it as an example of the [[matchmaking|matchmaker]]'s [[creativity]] and [[Falling in love|falls in love]] with her.<ref> |
[[Jane Austen]]'s novels are often concerned with the heroine's relationship with an eligible bachelor. Jane Austen's ''[[Emma (novel)|Emma]]'' particularly concerns a woman's attempt to obtain a husband for her friend by embellishing the truth. The gentleman in that case sees it as an example of the [[matchmaking|matchmaker]]'s [[creativity]] and [[Falling in love|falls in love]] with her.<ref>{{cite jstor|777029}}</ref> |
||
==Homosexuals as ''apparent'' eligible bachelors== |
==Homosexuals as ''apparent'' eligible bachelors== |
||
Revision as of 10:02, 13 June 2015
An eligible bachelor is a bachelor considered to be a particularly desirable potential husband, usually due to wealth, or social status.
In the United Kingdom, the heir to the throne or someone close in succession is often considered to be the nation's, or the world's most eligible bachelor, due to their social status, as has happened with Prince Charles[1] and Prince William.
Jane Austen's novels are often concerned with the heroine's relationship with an eligible bachelor. Jane Austen's Emma particularly concerns a woman's attempt to obtain a husband for her friend by embellishing the truth. The gentleman in that case sees it as an example of the matchmaker's creativity and falls in love with her.[2]
Homosexuals as apparent eligible bachelors
During the 1950s and 1960s, Rock Hudson was hailed as an eligible bachelor.[3] In the past, if a man chose to remain an eligible bachelor for long he may have been suspected of being homosexual,[4] and have been referred to euphemistically as a confirmed bachelor[5] a role closeted gay men may have played. The term 'confirmed bachelor' has fallen from common usage, as past life patterns involving marriage, divorce and prolonged bachelorhood have been altered for men since the advent of the sexual revolution.
Sociology
Robin Lakoff argues that the term indicates an inequality between men and women, as an "eligible bachelor" chooses to be a bachelor, whereas an "eligible spinster" does not have a choice. Lakoff believes this use of language fosters, and grows from, sexual discrimination.[6] Lakoff states "women are given their identity in our society by virtue of their relationship with men, and not vice versa."[7]
See also
References
- ^ [1] Diana Style By Colin McDowell
- ^ Attention: This template ({{cite jstor}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by jstor:777029, please use {{cite journal}} with
|jstor=777029instead. - ^ [2] Gay and Lesbian Professionals in the Closet
- ^ [3] hiv/aids and the older adult By Nokes, Kathleen Mary Nokes
- ^ [4] BP's jaw-dropping moment
- ^ [5] Words and Women. An eligible bachelor vs. an eligible spinster
- ^ [6] Sociolinguistics,By Christina Bratt Paulston, G. Richard Tucker