Jump to content

Talk:Madhuri Dixit: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 25: Line 25:
[[User:Drsoumyadeepb|Drsoumyadeepb]] ([[User talk:Drsoumyadeepb|talk]]) 00:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
[[User:Drsoumyadeepb|Drsoumyadeepb]] ([[User talk:Drsoumyadeepb|talk]]) 00:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
:Third party media confirms this [https://www.google.co.in/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=madhuri%20dixit%20unicef%20ambassador ample amount of times]. Please keep in mind that Official sources websites can be misleading as well and might not be updated, also she is listed [http://www.unicef.in/Celebrity/9/Madhuri-Dixit in the Indian website] for speaking up. You might be correct that the Goodwill Ambassador needs further research, which is itself validated by third party media. —[[User:IndianBio|<font size="2" face="Courier New" color="#6F00FF"><b>Indian:</b><font color="#FF033E">'''BIO'''</font></font>]] <sup>[ [[User talk:IndianBio|<font face="Tempus Sans ITC" color="#1C1CF0"><b>ChitChat</b></font>]] ]</sup> 06:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
:Third party media confirms this [https://www.google.co.in/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=madhuri%20dixit%20unicef%20ambassador ample amount of times]. Please keep in mind that Official sources websites can be misleading as well and might not be updated, also she is listed [http://www.unicef.in/Celebrity/9/Madhuri-Dixit in the Indian website] for speaking up. You might be correct that the Goodwill Ambassador needs further research, which is itself validated by third party media. —[[User:IndianBio|<font size="2" face="Courier New" color="#6F00FF"><b>Indian:</b><font color="#FF033E">'''BIO'''</font></font>]] <sup>[ [[User talk:IndianBio|<font face="Tempus Sans ITC" color="#1C1CF0"><b>ChitChat</b></font>]] ]</sup> 06:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

There is no reason to believe that UNICEF will have improper data on its official website (the opinion about official websites being misleading is clearly a bias of the person mentioning so). On careful examination of the third party media sources given I am of the opinion that she is not the UNICEF goodwill ambassador/advocate but was the brand ambassador for the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which was organised by UNICEF in 2014. The two are completely different since this is a brand ambassador for a particular event only. The same is concurred by the actress'es official website here : http://madhuridixit-nene.com/latest/post/madhuri-dixit-nene-unicef-brand-ambassador-dedicates-literature-carnival-lucknow-child-rights [[User:Drsoumyadeepb|Drsoumyadeepb]] ([[User talk:Drsoumyadeepb|talk]]) 14:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)


==Placement of Section on Legal notice for alleged false representation in Endorsements==
==Placement of Section on Legal notice for alleged false representation in Endorsements==

Revision as of 14:56, 17 June 2015


Madhuri Dixit not a UNICEF goodwill ambassador=

User talk:IndianBio has reverted the edit of mine in which he added back the information that she is an UNICEF GoodWill Ambassador citing http://www.unicef.org/about/annualreport/files/India_Annual_Report_2014.pdf The above report just mentions the actress name in two places viz "Madhuri Dixit advocated for children’s rights in UP " and "; engagement of children with celebrity Madhuri Dixit in Uttar Pradesh"

Please note that participation in one event does not make anyone a UNICEF good will Ambassador.It has to be an appointment . When I removed the unsourced information on her being a UNICEF goodwill ambassador I had thoroughly checked the list and did not find her name in any of the Categories (International/ Regional/National )here http://www.unicef.org/people/people_ambassadors.html

I do not think there is any other official source of UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador. Is there any ?

Drsoumyadeepb (talk) 00:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Third party media confirms this ample amount of times. Please keep in mind that Official sources websites can be misleading as well and might not be updated, also she is listed in the Indian website for speaking up. You might be correct that the Goodwill Ambassador needs further research, which is itself validated by third party media. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 06:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to believe that UNICEF will have improper data on its official website (the opinion about official websites being misleading is clearly a bias of the person mentioning so). On careful examination of the third party media sources given I am of the opinion that she is not the UNICEF goodwill ambassador/advocate but was the brand ambassador for the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which was organised by UNICEF in 2014. The two are completely different since this is a brand ambassador for a particular event only. The same is concurred by the actress'es official website here : http://madhuridixit-nene.com/latest/post/madhuri-dixit-nene-unicef-brand-ambassador-dedicates-literature-carnival-lucknow-child-rights Drsoumyadeepb (talk) 14:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Currently this section is placed under the section of Non-acting work. I do not think this might be proper as this is not her work primarily and is a controversy related to her endorsements. Any thoughts on how it might be better placed ? Drsoumyadeepb (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]