User talk:Sulfurboy

--Realmastery (talk) 05:40, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

See an issue needing an answer on my talk page that you could help with? Feel free to answer!

If your comment asks me to review an article, please hyperlink to it.

Please read my quick, personal FAQ before leaving a comment...3/4ths of all issues can be addressed here....if your question could be answered by reading the FAQ or you don't hyperlink to the article you're referencing, then I will ignore it.

Why did you not leave a comment when you tagged my page?

I typically won't unless I think the issue may be unclear. New page patrol is overwhelmed (~50,000 pages to be reviewed with only ~1000 being currently reviewed every week) and if I spent the time to explain every tag, I wouldn't be able to review even a third of the pages I do now.

I completely disagree with a tag you placed on my page!!

If you disagree with a tag, please state why on the article's talk page and leave a note here for me to review it. If you think the tag was a blatant error on my part (it happens, sorry), then please revert the edit and leave me a message letting me know that was the case.

I don't see a conversation or message I posted on your talk page...

Check the archives, conversations are typically automatically archived after five days. If you wish to comment on an archived section, please move it back to the main page. I do not regularly monitor my archive pages.

Why do you keep tagging my page? Do you have something against me?

No. Occasionally after you address certain issues, more issues will arise on my re-review. For example, let's say I first tagged your page for having no references, after you add references I may go back and add a tag for no in-line citations (which would have been irrelevant before there were references). Also, if there are multiple, small issues with your page and I can see you're new, I might just tag a few things at a time instead of overwhelming a new user. Please do not take any of my tags personally. I do not target people. I go straight down the list on the new page patrol. I do however regularly watch pages I review, which is why you might see me come up often in edits on your page.

Will you help me fix issues you tagged on my page?

Typically not, unless I need a break from new page patrol. Why? I used to do this and it got to be very overwhelming. I feel the actual new page patrol needs my help more than helping to fix things on already existing pages (not to mention there's others much more qualified than me for most fixes suchs as categories, copyediting, etc). It doesn't hurt to ask though, but please do not be offended if I do not help or don't respond. The tea house is your friend, use it. Note: I will always clarify on tags, though. All in all,don't hope the house will build itself!

I would like to give you an award, thank you note, or barnstar...

Thanks! You're awesome. And I always love the support. But please put it on my user page, not my talk page. :)

Tagging of article Norunn Tveiten Benestad

There is no basis for claiming that the article does not follow Wikipedia's policies. The Norwegian sources are to be trusted, even if the original language is Norwegian. I would therefore argue that the head tagging of this article is to be ceased immediately. The article, however, may retain the stub tag under, that was changed by me. User:Carsten R D

The tag involved your use of social media links, not norwegian links. I just assumed this was obvious, sorry.

Esperanza Cruz Hidalgo

You tagged my article Esperanza Cruz Hidalgo for deletion due to lack of citations.

You checked my page while I was still working on it. I have added citations. Thanks.

George Joannides

Additions to the page have been made, hopefully up to par. Joannides is an interesting historical figure; it's surprising there wasn't already a page created for him. Per your advise, I went to remove "the text that looks like this: Template:Proposed deletion/dated..." but couldn't locate it.

Your PROD at Liquid EP

A request has been made to restore this expired PROD. In case you feel it still merits deletion, you can use AFD instead. Cheers. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	U ARE THE BEST!!! ScarletTailNekoMataChan231577 (talk) 14:35, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Frankie MacDonald

Hi. I have reverted your tag for notability. Article has already been discussed at AfD where the result was keep. Please see [[1]] Regards,  Aloha27  talk  06:33, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Note about tagging

I left a note for you on the The Last Death of Henry Morgan's talk page.SciGal (talk) 09:48, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Never mind, the tag has been removed since I linked it to the main article.SciGal (talk) 09:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Stefaniya Staniyuta

Hello Sulfurboy. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Stefaniya Staniyuta, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: If she qualifies for a special postage stamp, that is certainly enough assertion of importance to pass A7. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Bush6984 responding

Hey, thank you for introducing yourself. I appreciate that human connection aspect (rather than just posting/tagging "silently"). While I still am relatively unfamiliar with the infinite complexity of Wikipedia's various editing facets, I appreciate the "coaching" from friendly Wikipedians like yourself. Thanks for the help.

Also, I apologize if I've overstepped my bounds by editing your page(s), but I noticed a few things and corrected them:

• I had to look up CSD and AFD, so I went ahead and added links to those, for any other newbies who are unfamiliar with the acronyms.
• In the "Please read my quick, personal FAQ before leaving a comment..." post, the grammar had the wrong usage of "your": "you're" is a contraction of "you + are" whereas the possessive "your/yours" is what you were looking for when you said "if you're question could be answered..." (the following usage, "the article you're referencing,..." is a correct you+are usage)

Thanks again for the help and introduction, for all the info/links on your page, and my apologies if I somehow offended you with any of my edits to your pages. Bush6984 (talk) 21:41, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for this! Sulfurboy (talk) 20:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Push Interactions

You tagged my article Push Interactions. What this means I don't know. But if we need to add more links we can. The links are quite a bit larger than the content at this point...Thanks.

Vracejte konve na místo.

Hello, friend.

I don' t understand your comment in my article very well, and I'd like to explain to me what do you mean.

This article has verifiable sources in Czech languaje (no broken links). Then, what is the problem?vThanks! Apega71 (talk) 01:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank You

Thanks a lot for reviewing Darshan filmography and Shiva Rajkumar filmography. ~ Irrigator ^talk 01:19, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reviewing Kim Yoo-jin (director).Jjaey (talk) 05:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Kazakhstani women's football cup

Hi, I'm Кырмызов! I would like to ask you removals of this page (Kazakhstani women's football cup) because already there is a page devoted to the Women's Cup of Kazakhstan (Kazakhstani Women's Cup). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Кырмызов (talk • contribs) 06:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thankyou for reviewing CSLRA; please tell how to improve it and what links are required to be incorporated in it to make it workable Srin2015 (talk) 06:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reviewing Nanami Hashimoto.Cutebassa (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

hi thank you, I don't speak much English and this is my first participation in Wikipedia .Amaneea99 — Preceding undated comment added 12:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Looney Tunes Home Video

Hey, man. :( What did I do wrong? I was only trying to make Looney Tunes-related Laserdisc Collections. :( --LooneyTunerIan (talk) 19:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Which tags are you confused about? They should be pretty obvious. The main problem is you don't have any references and the articles are orphans.Sulfurboy (talk) 19:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Tags? I didn't know I needed to add tags. I thought the categories were tags. --LooneyTunerIan (talk) 19:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for the comment, I'm working on the John G. Kelton page.

The Suspension Module that builds a parametric chassis

Hi Sulfurboy, can you tell me what's the problem with my article , to fix it. Tell me one by one the problems please and don't delete it, let me fix it. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gkalogiantsidis (talk • contribs) 20:20, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

The Suspension Module that builds a parametric chassis

Sulfurboy, are you kidding me, did you even see what i sent you.... ??? I sent you, don't delete my article and let me fix it and you just deleted it without any answer......

If you think that was from promo purpose, please tell me why this article is on wikipedia ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gkalogiantsidis (talk • contribs) 21:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Ultra

Hi! Thanks for helping me. I just started editing in English, I usually edit in Portuguese Wikipedia. I fixed the problems you mentioned. Let me know of you see anything else! Thanks! PicardJ (talk) 23:09, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Vulcan blazers

You recently reviewed the draft and concluded one section was overly long and you didn't know what it was about. I think you need to review your review, as the section you were referring to is not a part of the draft, and your changes have made it seen that it is part of the lede! That section was a rebuttal to another editor whose comment was the one that pops up when scrolling the drafts stating that the article was 'blatant self promotion', which he declined to remove. It pre-judged the article which was subsequently re-written in the current form and you have now followed up in mis-judging the point of the article. I would ask that you take another look and find the beginning of the lede and judge the article from that point on. Robco311 (talk) 01:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

I did look at it from the 'lead', I wasn't referring to the comments before in my review at all. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC).

Dear Sulfurboy Thanks for yours review of the Hidayat al-Muta`allemin Fi al-Tibb,this is the first book about medical emergency in Persian language from one thousand ago ,I hope this article will be better in future with help of lovers of history and culture of the world like you. Thank you very much.--Realmastery (talk) 05:40, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

07:44:30, 19 June 2015 review of submission by Bumsnuggler

• Bumsnuggler (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Michael Alan Lerner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Michael Alan Lerner is a screenwriter who has written many movies starring people who are notable enough to already have a wikipedia page. I've seen entries far less worthy of having a wiki page. All my sources are from major publications like the NY Times and Variety. Why is this page continually rejected?

Bumsnuggler (talk) 07:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)