Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PenLover: Difference between revisions
checked |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
I believe new users have the rights to exist, be active in wikipedia and share their opinions on certain topics. It is true that I myself has shown more interests on one specific topic and that is because I have been watching that topic closely since a year ago. I don't think sharing the same idea does contribute to any sort of vandalism. My comment and my concern shared on education discrimination page is well referenced and is in accordance with rules and regulations. More than that, it is not true that I have solely been active on this topic. I have also made some minor, major edits on other articles which can be tracked on my contribution list easily. [[User:Hkhaledi|Hkhaledi]] ([[User talk:Hkhaledi|talk]]) 00:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
Revision as of 00:39, 28 June 2015
Sedai2014
Sedai2014 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Please note that a case was originally opened under PenLover (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sedai2014. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sedai2014.
25 June 2015
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Educationinpeace (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- WorldPeaceLove (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Hkhaledi (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
all account shows sudden interest in AFD page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discrimination in education in Norway and all accounts have shown interest in promoting SEDAI cause and related page and master account admitted to be a supporter of the organisation and its cause see [1]. all 3 were created in June and in a similar pattern,14 June WorldPeaceLove, 15 Educationinpeace and on 25th June Hkhaledi, all 4 accounts contrubtion are similar and shown interest in Discrimination in education in Norway (new page) created by Sedai2014. Nicky mathew (talk) 23:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I believe new users have the rights to exist, be active in wikipedia and share their opinions on certain topics. It is true that I myself has shown more interests on one specific topic and that is because I have been watching that topic closely since a year ago. I don't think sharing the same idea does contribute to any sort of vandalism. My comment and my concern shared on education discrimination page is well referenced and is in accordance with rules and regulations. More than that, it is not true that I have solely been active on this topic. I have also made some minor, major edits on other articles which can be tracked on my contribution list easily. Hkhaledi (talk) 00:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- All 4 accounts are Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to be related. If not, then they are certainly meatpuppets. Mike V • Talk 19:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)