Jump to content

Gun laws in Guam: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
|
|
|-
|-
| Permit to purchase/License required || Yes || Yes || 60103, 60106 || FOID required.
| Permit to purchase || Yes || Yes || 60103, 60106 || FOID required.
|-
| Owner License Required || Yes || Yes || 60106 || FOID required
|-
|-
| Firearm registration? || Yes|| Yes || 60110 ||
| Firearm registration? || Yes|| Yes || 60110 ||

Revision as of 20:24, 1 July 2015

Gun laws in Guam regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in Guam, an unincorporated territory of the United States.[1][2] As Guam is a territory of the United States, many U.S. federal laws apply, as well as Constitutional rulings and protections.

Summary table

Subject/Law Long guns Handguns Relevant Statutes Notes
Permit to purchase Yes Yes 60103, 60106 FOID required.
Owner License Required Yes Yes 60106 FOID required
Firearm registration? Yes Yes 60110
Assault weapon law No No
Magazine capacity restriction? No No
NFA weapons Yes Yes SBR, SBS, Machine guns, and silencers are prohibited. Destructive devices and AOW's are legal with NFA tax stamp.
Castle law
Yes[3]
Concealed carry license issued? No Yes 60109 Shall Issue. Bill 296-32 passed by legislature for shall issue,[4] signed by Governor."Governor signs 12 bills, vetoes 2".
Open Carry Yes Yes FOID required.[1]


Open Carry

A Firearms ID card, valid for 3 years from date of issue, allows possession and open carry of all legal firearms in Guam. One may open carry handguns or long guns.

Concealed carry

Location of Guam in relation to the continental United States

Guam was previously a may-issue jurisdiction, and generally approved very few permits (~50/year). Bill 296-32 was introduced by senators Tony Ada, Aline Yamashita, Chris Duenas, Tommy Morrison, Rory Respicio, Brant McCreadie and Michael San Nicolas, which after it was signed by Governor Eddie Calvo converted Guam to be a shall-issue jurisdiction. Guam is in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and therefore the ruling in Peruta v. San Diego is in effect, which one of the sponsors cited as a reason for the proposed law.[5]

References