Defects per million opportunities: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Weasel elimination |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:<MATH>DPMO = \frac{1,000,000 \times \mbox{number of defects}}{\mbox{number of units} \times \mbox{number of opportunities per unit}}</MATH> |
:<MATH>DPMO = \frac{1,000,000 \times \mbox{number of defects}}{\mbox{number of units} \times \mbox{number of opportunities per unit}}</MATH> |
||
A defect is defined as a nonconformance of a quality characteristic (e.g. strength, width, response time) to its specification. DPMO is stated in opportunities per million units for convenience: Processes that are considered highly capable (e.g., processes of [[Six Sigma]] quality) are those that experience only a handful of defects per million units produced (or services provided). |
A defect is defined as a nonconformance of a quality characteristic (e.g. strength, width, response time) to its specification. DPMO is stated in opportunities per million units for convenience: Processes that are considered highly capable (e.g., processes of [[Six Sigma]] quality) are those that experience only a handful {{citation needed|reason=Please define handful in mathematical terms, or reword this phrase|date=July 2015}} of defects per million units produced (or services provided). |
||
Note that DPMO differs from reporting defective parts per million (PPM) in that it comprehends the possibility that a unit under inspection may be found to have multiple defects of the same type or may have multiple types of defects. Identifying specific opportunities for defects (and therefore how to count and categorize defects) is an art, but generally organizations consider the following when defining the number of opportunities per unit: |
Note that DPMO differs from reporting defective parts per million (PPM) in that it comprehends the possibility that a unit under inspection may be found to have multiple defects of the same type or may have multiple types of defects. Identifying specific opportunities for defects (and therefore how to count and categorize defects) is an art, but generally organizations consider the following when defining the number of opportunities per unit: |
Revision as of 02:47, 3 July 2015
In process improvement efforts, defects per million opportunities or DPMO (or nonconformities per million opportunities (NPMO)) is a measure of process performance. It is defined as
A defect is defined as a nonconformance of a quality characteristic (e.g. strength, width, response time) to its specification. DPMO is stated in opportunities per million units for convenience: Processes that are considered highly capable (e.g., processes of Six Sigma quality) are those that experience only a handful [citation needed] of defects per million units produced (or services provided).
Note that DPMO differs from reporting defective parts per million (PPM) in that it comprehends the possibility that a unit under inspection may be found to have multiple defects of the same type or may have multiple types of defects. Identifying specific opportunities for defects (and therefore how to count and categorize defects) is an art, but generally organizations consider the following when defining the number of opportunities per unit:
- Knowledge of the process under study
- Industry standards
- When studying multiple types of defects, knowledge of the relative importance of each defect type in determining customer satisfaction
- The time, effort, and cost to count and categorize defects in process output
Other measures of process performance include:
- Process capability indices such as Cpk
- Natural tolerance limit or sigma level
- PPM defective or defective parts per million
- Process performance indices such as Ppk
- Quality costs or cost of poor quality (COPQ)