User talk:Russlowe: Difference between revisions
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Hi there. I appreciate this feedback, and clarification. I will work on the edits you mention, and understand why they're important to get right. I'll resubmit once the citations and edits are complete. Thanks! |
Hi there. I appreciate this feedback, and clarification. I will work on the edits you mention, and understand why they're important to get right. I'll resubmit once the citations and edits are complete. Thanks! |
||
[[User:Russlowe|Russlowe]] ([[User talk:Russlowe#top|talk]]) 21:58, 11 July 2015 (UTC) |
[[User:Russlowe|Russlowe]] ([[User talk:Russlowe#top|talk]]) 21:58, 11 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
Hello! Please take a look and re-review this page now. I took your feedback into account, cited additional sources, and removed a few things that might have been viewed as self-promotional / speculative. Thanks for the assistance! [[User:Russlowe|Russlowe]] ([[User talk:Russlowe#top|talk]]) 23:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:45, 12 July 2015
Welcome!
Hello, Russlowe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?
Hello, Russlowe!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
|
Boone Speed draft
Hello! I've taken another look at your Boone Speed draft. I have not "reviewed" it officially, as I generally prefer to have a different editor, who may have a disparate perspective, provide a secondary review. I do have a few comments I hope you find helpful. The first sentence says he is an "influential figure" within rock climbing. How so? That statement isn't really fleshed out or specified, either in the section or in the article in general. As such it appears to promote the subject, instead of providing encyclopedic information. The third paragraph has got to go. It is blatantly promotional. Instead of saying "his work is great" which is supported by an interview with Boone, say "(noted art critic) states his work has a quality of global connectivity....." The first is self-promotion. The second is serious analysis. I can't comment on the notability of many of the publications you cite, hopefully an editor with expertise on rock climbing culture will review the draft next. If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia's reliable source policy. The section "Creative Career" is completely un-sourced. Please find some independent, reliable sources to support these assertions. All the best, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. I appreciate this feedback, and clarification. I will work on the edits you mention, and understand why they're important to get right. I'll resubmit once the citations and edits are complete. Thanks! Russlowe (talk) 21:58, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Please take a look and re-review this page now. I took your feedback into account, cited additional sources, and removed a few things that might have been viewed as self-promotional / speculative. Thanks for the assistance! Russlowe (talk) 23:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)