In re Primus: Difference between revisions
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
{{wikisource}} |
{{wikisource}} |
||
* {{caselaw source |
* {{caselaw source |
||
| case=In re Primus |
| case=''In re Primus'', 436 U.S. 412 (1978) |
||
| justia=http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/436/412/ |
| justia=http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/436/412/ |
||
}} |
}} |
Revision as of 17:18, 15 July 2015
In re Primus | |
---|---|
Argued January 16, 1978 Decided May 30, 1978 | |
Full case name | In re Primus |
Citations | 436 U.S. 412 (more) |
Holding | |
Solicitation of prospective litigants by nonprofit organizations that engage in litigation as a form of political expression and political association constitutes expressive and associational conduct entitled to First Amendment protection. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Powell, joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Blackmun, Stevens; Marshall (all but the first paragraph of part VI) |
Concurrence | Blackmun |
Concurrence | Marshall |
Dissent | Rehnquist |
Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV |
In re Primus, 436 U.S. 412 (1978), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that solicitation of prospective litigants by nonprofit organizations that engage in litigation as a form of political expression and political association constitutes expressive and associational conduct entitled to First Amendment protection.
Background
Primus was an attorney for the South Carolina affiliate of the ACLU. South Carolina had a policy of sterilizing certain women as a condition of receiving welfare. Primus sent letters to women who had been thusly sterilized, offering the legal assistance of the ACLU. The South Carolina's Supreme Court disciplinary board reprimanded Primus for violating South Carolina bar rules against soliciting business. The South Carolina Supreme Court approved the discipline. Primus appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Opinion of the Court
The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the discipline, ruling that solicitation of prospective litigants by nonprofit organizations that engage in litigation as a form of political expression and political association constitutes expressive and associational conduct entitled to First Amendment protection.
See also
- NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963)
References
External links
- Text of In re Primus, 436 U.S. 412 (1978) is available from: Justia