Jump to content

In re Primus: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 37: Line 37:
{{wikisource}}
{{wikisource}}
* {{caselaw source
* {{caselaw source
| case=In re Primus - 436 U.S. 412 (1978)
| case=''In re Primus'', 436 U.S. 412 (1978)
| justia=http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/436/412/
| justia=http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/436/412/
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:18, 15 July 2015

In re Primus
Argued January 16, 1978
Decided May 30, 1978
Full case nameIn re Primus
Citations436 U.S. 412 (more)
Holding
Solicitation of prospective litigants by nonprofit organizations that engage in litigation as a form of political expression and political association constitutes expressive and associational conduct entitled to First Amendment protection.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun · Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist · John P. Stevens
Case opinions
MajorityPowell, joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Blackmun, Stevens; Marshall (all but the first paragraph of part VI)
ConcurrenceBlackmun
ConcurrenceMarshall
DissentRehnquist
Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV

In re Primus, 436 U.S. 412 (1978), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that solicitation of prospective litigants by nonprofit organizations that engage in litigation as a form of political expression and political association constitutes expressive and associational conduct entitled to First Amendment protection.

Background

Primus was an attorney for the South Carolina affiliate of the ACLU. South Carolina had a policy of sterilizing certain women as a condition of receiving welfare. Primus sent letters to women who had been thusly sterilized, offering the legal assistance of the ACLU. The South Carolina's Supreme Court disciplinary board reprimanded Primus for violating South Carolina bar rules against soliciting business. The South Carolina Supreme Court approved the discipline. Primus appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Opinion of the Court

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the discipline, ruling that solicitation of prospective litigants by nonprofit organizations that engage in litigation as a form of political expression and political association constitutes expressive and associational conduct entitled to First Amendment protection.

See also

References

  • Text of In re Primus, 436 U.S. 412 (1978) is available from: Justia