Talk:Vanessa Kerry: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:33, 25 July 2015

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 4, 2007	Articles for deletion	Merged
April 18, 2015	Guild of Copy Editors	Copyedited

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Montana Start‑class

	Montana portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

HMS Faculty

She is affiliated faculty of HMS, as is everyone who is a physician at any of the teaching hospitals that are affiliated with Harvard. This is distinct from being on the faculty. Not to minimize her role at MGH, but Harvard has 146 tenure-track and tenured faculty. The affiliated number 11,000. http://hms.harvard.edu/about-hms/hms-affiliates — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.79.250.209 (talk) 02:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

This article was redirected to Kerry her father and her sister wasn't. so I think she is notable enough to have an article, even if her independent accomplishments, in and off themselves, borderline noterity, but she obviously was in public stage b/c of her father's campaign and role.--Mikerussell 22:19, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015 GOCE edit

I just did a fairly straightforward WP:GOCE review and edit. NO CONTENT or SOURCES were removed, it was a simple cut and past with the addition of the some sections for clarity and consistency with other BLP articles. For non-U.S. Readers, I added some context as to who John Kerry is in the Lead, otherwise the article contains pretty much what it started with prior to my efforts. Regards, --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 20:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

@Froggyleap54 and Avaya1: I've declined to fully protect this article but both of you need to start using the talk page please. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:47, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: I believe Froggyleap54 is associated with the subject's spouse. If I remember correctly they object to the inclusion of the Iranian American qualifier, perhaps because of the relationship with John Kerry (I'm just theorizing here). Vanessa Kerry's husband used to have an article, which was deleted after an AFD, and that also attracted some (I assume) Iranian editors who were insistent on highlighting the subject's heritage. Honestly I see no harm in including that information, except that it has become a point of contention I guess so on the other hand I'd err in the side of courtesy and take the position that the husband's ancestry is irrelevant to this article and WP:NPF applies since he no longer has an article. In any case, the edit warring has started up again so I protected the article. Perhaps the parties can weigh in here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is sourced and notable content - sourced to Le Figaro. I can't understand the justification for its removal, since it uses up one sentence and was considered notable by one of the world's most famous newspapers. The removal of sentence has a sense of being censorship. Avaya1 (talk) 19:29, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:31, 25 July 2015 edit Avaya1 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 28,106 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:33, 25 July 2015 edit undo Avaya1 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 28,106 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:{{ping\|NeilN}} I believe Froggyleap54 is associated with the subject's spouse. If I remember correctly they object to the inclusion of the Iranian American qualifier, perhaps because of the relationship with John Kerry (I'm just theorizing here). Vanessa Kerry's husband used to have an article, which was deleted after an AFD, and that also attracted some (I assume) Iranian editors who were insistent on highlighting the subject's heritage. Honestly I see no harm in including that information, except that it has become a point of contention I guess so on the other hand I'd err in the side of courtesy and take the position that the husband's ancestry is irrelevant to this article and [[WP:NPF]] applies since he no longer has an article. In any case, the edit warring has started up again so I protected the article. Perhaps the parties can weigh in here. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§[[User:FreeRangeFrog\|<span style="color:#00CA00">FreeRangeFrog</span>]]</span><sup>[[User talk:FreeRangeFrog\|croak]]</sup> 06:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)		:{{ping\|NeilN}} I believe Froggyleap54 is associated with the subject's spouse. If I remember correctly they object to the inclusion of the Iranian American qualifier, perhaps because of the relationship with John Kerry (I'm just theorizing here). Vanessa Kerry's husband used to have an article, which was deleted after an AFD, and that also attracted some (I assume) Iranian editors who were insistent on highlighting the subject's heritage. Honestly I see no harm in including that information, except that it has become a point of contention I guess so on the other hand I'd err in the side of courtesy and take the position that the husband's ancestry is irrelevant to this article and [[WP:NPF]] applies since he no longer has an article. In any case, the edit warring has started up again so I protected the article. Perhaps the parties can weigh in here. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§[[User:FreeRangeFrog\|<span style="color:#00CA00">FreeRangeFrog</span>]]</span><sup>[[User talk:FreeRangeFrog\|croak]]</sup> 06:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

	::: It is sourced and notable content - sourced to [[Le Figaro]]. I can't understand the justification for its removal, since it uses up one sentence and was considered notable by one of the world's most famous newspapers. [[User:Avaya1\|Avaya1]] ([[User talk:Avaya1\|talk]]) 19:29, 25 July 2015 (UTC)		::: It is sourced and notable content - sourced to [[Le Figaro]]. I can't understand the justification for its removal, since it uses up one sentence and was considered notable by one of the world's most famous newspapers. The removal of sentence has a sense of being censorship. [[User:Avaya1\|Avaya1]] ([[User talk:Avaya1\|talk]]) 19:29, 25 July 2015 (UTC)