Jump to content

Talk:Constellation program: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Proposed Merge==
==Proposed Merge==
I object on the grounds that project orion is about to become a widely used search term in its own right. It will then be split into its own article, anyway. Just let the little stub simmer here for a while and see what happens. [[User:Give Peace A Chance|Give Peace A Chance]] 01:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I object on the grounds that project orion is about to become a widely used search term in its own right. It will then be split into its own article, anyway. Just let the little stub simmer here for a while and see what happens. [[User:Give Peace A Chance|Give Peace A Chance]] 01:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

----

The [[Apollo]] (the mission name) entry is separate from the [[Saturn]] (the launch vehicle) entry. Why should we deviate from this format? [[Project Orion (lunar program)]] is specifically geared towards a landing on the moon. [[Project Constellation]] has a larger scope, encompasing a entire new launch system. I think as the two topics mature, it will be clear that keeping them separate is best.
--[[User:Davebenham|Davebenham]] 02:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:46, 3 August 2006

Proposed Merge

I object on the grounds that project orion is about to become a widely used search term in its own right. It will then be split into its own article, anyway. Just let the little stub simmer here for a while and see what happens. Give Peace A Chance 01:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The Apollo (the mission name) entry is separate from the Saturn (the launch vehicle) entry. Why should we deviate from this format? Project Orion (lunar program) is specifically geared towards a landing on the moon. Project Constellation has a larger scope, encompasing a entire new launch system. I think as the two topics mature, it will be clear that keeping them separate is best. --Davebenham 02:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]