Jump to content

Talk:Mahavatar Babaji: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Identity: +91-7357662522HARYANA+919541496684 KE MASHUR+ TANTRIK MIYAJI VASHIKARAN SPECIALIST,lost love spells,black magic spells,love problem solution,Love spells get ex love back,how to get ex back,Intercast love marriage specialist,Aghori baba ji,h
m Reverted edits by Babajiuu (talk) to last version by 24.78.196.175
Line 21: Line 21:
}}
}}


== Identity ==
+91-7357662522HARYANA+919541496684 KE MASHUR+ TANTRIK MIYAJI VASHIKARAN SPECIALIST,lost love spells,black magic spells,love problem solution,Love spells get ex love back,how to get ex back,Intercast love marriage specialist,Aghori baba ji,husband wife problem solution,divorce problem solution,Lesbian Spell,get lost love back


This debate is absurd. The whole point is to realize that Babaji is God and EVERYONE and EVERYTHING is God. EVERYONE IS BABAJI. When all of these different saints are saying they are Babaji, there is no contradiction. If they all were together in one room, they would not argue, "I am Babaji" - "No, I am!" It would go "I am Babaji," - "Yes, I am too." Namaste[[User:Yonderboy|Yonderboy]] 19:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
World famous guru ji +91-9541496684 get your lost love back by vashikaran mantra .
love marriage problem solution specialist aghori baba ji get 101% garunted solution . all problem, specialist baba ji +91-9541496684 . Love Vashikaran specialist online solution by baba ji +91-7357662522EMAIL miyaj0138@gmail.com


:That is very true! In the deepest sense, there is no contradictions whatsoever! --<font style="background:gold">[[WP:ESP|<font color="green">S</font>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">[[User talk:Siva1979|Talk to me]]</font></sup> 09:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
mohini vashikaran mantra specialist aghori baba ji se garh bathe paye sabhi samshya ka free 101% garunted samadhan

asith sidhi sadhna se free samadhan paye only 1 call can changed your life . +91-7357662522 EMIL miyaj0138@gmail.com

An astrologer has all the solution of problems regarding to love, love marriage and career. In simple if here talking about love then there is lots of problem comes at each moving step of love life.
+91-7357662522HARYANA+919541496684 KE MASHUR+ TANTRIK MIYAJI VASHIKARAN SPECIALIST,lost love spells,black magic spells,love problem solution,Love spells get ex love back,how to get ex back,Intercast love marriage specialist,Aghori baba ji,husband wife problem solution,divorce problem solution,Lesbian Spell,get lost love back

World famous guru ji +91-9541496684 get your lost love back by vashikaran mantra .
love marriage problem solution specialist aghori baba ji get 101% garunted solution . all problem, specialist baba ji +91-9541496684 . Love Vashikaran specialist online solution by baba ji +91-7357662522EMAIL miyaj0138@gmail.com

mohini vashikaran mantra specialist aghori baba ji se garh bathe paye sabhi samshya ka free 101% garunted samadhan

asith sidhi sadhna se free samadhan paye only 1 call can changed your life . +91-7357662522 EMIL miyaj0138@gmail.com

An astrologer has all the solution of problems regarding to love, love marriage and career. In simple if here talking about love then there is lots of problem comes at each moving step of love life.


== 279 ==
== 279 ==

Revision as of 02:05, 2 August 2015

Identity

This debate is absurd. The whole point is to realize that Babaji is God and EVERYONE and EVERYTHING is God. EVERYONE IS BABAJI. When all of these different saints are saying they are Babaji, there is no contradiction. If they all were together in one room, they would not argue, "I am Babaji" - "No, I am!" It would go "I am Babaji," - "Yes, I am too." NamasteYonderboy 19:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is very true! In the deepest sense, there is no contradictions whatsoever! --Siva1979Talk to me 09:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

279

Indeed I am Babaji is the correct statement despite whomsoever in this manifest form makes it. However it must be noted that the active element of the ego must have disappeared to confine the notion of 'I' to its true state, that is, the I in everyone. If stated with ego acting, this aspect of 'I' is ego, is false. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishal279 (talkcontribs) 03:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For name

Mahavatar Babaji is not a name in the meaning of the place of incarnation of great father. Will you change the name to Mahavatar Babaji Nagaraj or Babaji Nagaraj? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.26.2.2 (talk) 23:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

harik

'I'is not the only means of an ego in Hinduism.For an enlightened masters or Prophets it mean of His invisible self or immortality self.self is awareness of mind in physical form and another means by self as awareness in super conscious state of cosmic intelligence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.133.168.230 (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

iUniverse sources

I'm not sure when these sources were introduced, but iUniverse books are self-published. The listed author, "Yoga Nikitan", does not appear to be a recognized published authority. These sources are not reliable and need to be removed. Any comments or feedback before I do so? Yworo (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mahavatar Babaji Nagraj

With the most uptodate authentic first hand experience reveleations about this great Yogi by living yogi Sri M in his autobiography " Apprenticed to Himalayan Master-Autobiograhy of a Yogi".There are atleast 3 occassions Sri M had direct experience with Babaji narrated in his book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kgm.amogh (talkcontribs) 06:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A note on age and dates

"In his book The Second Coming of Christ, Yogananda states that Jesus Christ went to India and conferred with Mahavatar Babaji. This would make Babaji at least 2000 years old."

Just a note - Ahmadi Muslims among others believe Jesus lived to one hundred and twenty years. While this is still at odds with the given birth date of 203 CE, it does mean the quoted sentence above should read "almost" 2000 years old rather than "at least" 2000 years old.

24.78.196.175 (talk) 15:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]