Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melvin Wright: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Adamr.p1s (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Law|list of Law-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 11:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Law|list of Law-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 11:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' As the creator of this article, I have revised the page in a way that I believe addresses concerns about notability, specifically discussion of the active role Wright has played in high-profile litigation at the national level and in Florida. [[User:Adamr.p1s|Adamr.p1s]] ([[User talk:Adamr.p1s|talk]]) 16:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' As the creator of this article, I have revised the page in a way that I believe addresses concerns about notability, specifically discussion of the active role Wright has played in high-profile litigation at the national level and in Florida. [[User:Adamr.p1s|Adamr.p1s]] ([[User talk:Adamr.p1s|talk]]) 16:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' I think this article is properly cited and adds value to wWikipedia, I don't think there are any significant notability issues that deem this deletion-worthy

Revision as of 22:19, 6 August 2015

Melvin Wright (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems not notable (after having consulted the notability guidelines) Bjornte (talk) 18:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguinHangout 19:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguinHangout 19:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As the creator of this article, I have revised the page in a way that I believe addresses concerns about notability, specifically discussion of the active role Wright has played in high-profile litigation at the national level and in Florida. Adamr.p1s (talk) 16:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I think this article is properly cited and adds value to wWikipedia, I don't think there are any significant notability issues that deem this deletion-worthy