Talk:Automated vacuum collection: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:35, 7 August 2015

Environment Start‑class Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Automated vacuum collection be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Proposed merge

I fully support the proposed merge - these are effectively duplicate articles. If there is no dissent I will make it happen. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:38, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree and done. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hype vs Reality

The problem with finding information on which systems are actually in place world-wide is that the information available consists mostly of hyped-up press releases. Lots of promises and hype regarding future systems, and few facts. For example, there is a lot of press available about the Montreal vacuum waste system, but after a bit of digging I discovered that it had actually been cancelled.

It makes me wonder if the examples of installed systems-- at least those without references -- should just be deleted. They make the article sound like advertising. 198.58.150.217 (talk) 06:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 == Hype vs Reality ==
-The problem with finding information on which systems are actually in place world-wide is that the information available consists mostly of hyped-up press releases. Lots of promises and hype regarding future systems, and few facts. For example, there is a lot of press available about the Montreal Vacuum waste system, but after a bit of digging I discovered that it had actually been cancelled.
+The problem with finding information on which systems are actually in place world-wide is that the information available consists mostly of hyped-up press releases. Lots of promises and hype regarding future systems, and few facts. For example, there is a lot of press available about the Montreal vacuum waste system, but after a bit of digging I discovered that it had actually been cancelled.
 It makes me wonder if the examples of installed systems-- at least those without references -- should just be deleted. They make the article sound like advertising. [[Special:Contributions/198.58.150.217|198.58.150.217]] ([[User talk:198.58.150.217|talk]]) 06:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)