Jump to content

User talk:Gilliam: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 342: Line 342:
If you don't already have it, you might be interested in [[User:GregU/dashes.js|this script]]. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 12:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
If you don't already have it, you might be interested in [[User:GregU/dashes.js|this script]]. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 12:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
:Thanks! I'll try it out.– [[User:Gilliam|Gilliam]] ([[User talk:Gilliam|talk]]) 21:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
:Thanks! I'll try it out.– [[User:Gilliam|Gilliam]] ([[User talk:Gilliam|talk]]) 21:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

== Request for talk page removal. ==

I think you better revoke [[User:31.47.245.36]]'s talk page abilities. He is making an unblock request, and the reason he gave was, "RAHOWA". [[User:Studentaccountantghost4|Studentaccountantghost4]] ([[User talk:Studentaccountantghost4|talk]]) 19:16, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:16, 9 August 2015

Dear Mr. Gillian, I am Boris Tsenter, Ds., PhD. In 1964 we got first patent concerning Ni-H2 battery #194155. You can find that via link www.patentdb.com Just type patent number in upper bar. We also got the first American patent #3669744.I can send you copy of all mentioned patents. We were awarded the first Ni-H2 patents in. England, Germany and France. Me and Kloss are 20 years citizens of USA and we will fight for the restoration of the truth. Let me know please what additional documents do you need for the proving of our priority. Respectfully, Boris Tsenter — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.193.68.164 (talk) 21:53, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We need a reliable source stating the fact. I can't read Russian, so if you believe the site http://patentdb.su meets RS guidelines, I might be able to help you to create a reference.– Gilliam (talk) 00:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question about rollbacker role

Greetings! As a member who find twinkle a life-saver (in terms of reverting good faith edits), I was hoping to request rollbacker rights through you, or inquire where I can make such a request. I do not feel I have enough experience yet to be request administrator-rights, however I would find it useful to have rollback privileges to simply the process of having to go through administrators for vandalism fixes that do not require a user block or ban. Would you be able to pass me along any information on whether this is possible? Thank you! Garchy (talk) 20:26, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you get a few hundred more edits reverting vandalism in WP:RC Patrol, I will consider giving you the Rollback right.– Gilliam (talk) 03:40, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info! Cheers - Garchy (talk) 14:56, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Gilliam:, I'm back again! Hoping you can recheck my status on Rollback rights, I've done plenty more RC Patrol's as well as New Page Patrols. Thanks! Garchy (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for approving! Garchy (talk) 22:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sock puppet

Hi. reverted to version before editwar. IP 101.62.134.37 was sock puppet of blocked MCIWS. IP 115 several 115 IPs same person is removing my comments to hide himself. Compare edits.

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1947&type=revision&diff=670211488&oldid=670210559

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1947&type=revision&diff=670329086&oldid=670320519

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1947&type=revision&diff=670337874&oldid=670336061 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.50.118.182 (talk) 10:03, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing the new WikiProject Ghana!

Greetings!

The flag of Hampshire

I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Ghana! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 3,474 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in Ghana.

Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 20:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

Semi protect

Similar request to prior ones – semi for Robert Upshaw please. DaHuzyBru (talk) 18:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wider block possible?

I noticed your recent proxy block of a 45.56.* IP. The Whois tool says this is Linode, and it's part of a /18 range. What about blocking the whole range?: 45.56.64.0/18 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)). There is no excuse for Wikipedia edits from a web hosting firm like Linode. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. If you know of more ranges please let me know.– Gilliam (talk) 04:15, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User block

Hey. Would a block be warranted for this user? Added same unsourced nickname over and over again to the same article, even after fair warning and a "final warning". DaHuzyBru (talk) 12:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. Send me another message if the user persists.– Gilliam (talk) 12:30, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:HJ Mitchell

I'm sorry but I inadvertantly changed your page protection. I was so concerned with speed and deleting the obscene revisions that I didn't notice you had already protected the page. My pp was shorter than yours, if you wish to chage it back to your longer one I have absolutely no objections. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The shorter protection is just fine. The length of time I had specified is the default time on Twinkle.– Gilliam (talk) 08:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

J. J. Thomson edit warning

I don't think J. J. Thomson (1856-1940) counts as recently deceased :) Ttwaring (talk) 17:24, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Samrajya S.R.A

Hello Gilliam, I hope that you are doing well. I am seeking guidance on how to resolve an ongoing issue with User:Samrajya S.R.A. For the past month, this editor has received multiple warnings, requesting valid sources be provided for WP:BLP changes to specific articles. All attempts to communicate have gone ignored. Is there an appropriate noticeboard to post this to? I'm not sure how best to proceed at this point. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 18:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yamaguchi先生. You can start a discussion at WP:BLPN. I don't know much about Indian film actors.– Gilliam (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Gilliam. I have posted to BLPN regarding this matter: Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Nithin. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 19:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Gilliam. In additional to the BLPN, I have raised this growing concern to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard yesterday. If your schedule permits, will you please review my findings and let me know if you share the same assessment? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 16:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I'll be back at my desk later today and should find time then.– Gilliam (talk) 16:30, 16 July 2015 (UTC) User:Samrajya S.R.A is blocked for disruption and claiming ownership of articles, despite having been warned. Please let me know if this behavior continues.– Gilliam (talk) 04:14, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ifpi dk

so what to do when you and page vinfringes on our rights its all fine and dandy "you can talk on talk page"... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.104.113.89 (talk) 11:22, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at User talk:2.104.113.89.– Gilliam (talk) 11:24, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

I have never, ever seen Wikipedia resolve an edit conflict like this before. --NeilN talk to me 20:59, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't even know that was possible!– Gilliam (talk) 22:47, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thanks for reverting my revert. It looks like there was more vandalism than I originally reverted that I should have. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It's happened to me as well on a number of occasions.– Gilliam (talk) 23:04, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Spieth

Hello, Gilliam .. I was wondering, with the Jordan Spieth article averaging roughly 10,000 views per day (and one day recently it had over 140,000 views), and with the temporary protection you put on it a few days ago having worn off and earlier today a little bit of mischief had to be reversed on that article, would it be too much to ask that some more protection be put on it again right now to keep inevitable vandalism from happening in the next few days? I ask this because the Open Championship is about to begin tomorrow and it will be a high profile time for Spieth, and compared to a few days ago, the vandalism will likely pick up steam, making it a bit of a hassle for the golf editors to have to deal with. I figure having some protection again, but this time for a week or two (at the least), would discourage most would be vandals from going on there and making things difficult. Thank you. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 12:55, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I protected it for 3 days. Please let me know if protection needs to be applied again.– Gilliam (talk) 12:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Gilliam. And I will. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 13:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP block

Hey. Could this IP please be blocked. Clearly not here to contribute, and has not heeded to my warnings. Cheers. DaHuzyBru (talk) 10:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done.– Gilliam (talk) 10:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

how do i add timeline you message me ipod touch help please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.172.12.174 (talk) 06:41, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IPod Touch already has timeline. If the timeline is inaccurate, you can start a discussion at Talk:IPod Touch.– Gilliam (talk) 06:44, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive user

Hey. I'm being personally attacked on my talk page by this user, twice now. Pretty unwarranted in my opinion. DaHuzyBru (talk) 09:40, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user is already blocked, but I added the user's talk page to my watchlist.– Gilliam (talk) 12:33, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

You been good with Wikipedia im deserving you a Baklava Whakaoriori (talk) 09:09, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the kind gesture!– Gilliam (talk) 21:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi

Semi for Richard Jefferson please. Same reasoning as before. Cheers. DaHuzyBru (talk) 19:47, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done– Gilliam (talk) 19:55, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Same editor?

Hi - is this IP same one you blocked here yesterday or coincidental edits at here? Thanks. - JennyOz (talk) 12:31, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since both IPs are from Australia, I would not be surprised if it's the same vandal. But since the edits to 1997 Thredbo landslide are almost a month apart, I'll just leave a standard warning.– Gilliam (talk) 12:40, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for addressing. - JennyOz (talk) 12:59, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A prank only account

Hello Gilliam, this morning I found an IP editor who has been putting a death notice on several pages of celevrities who are not dead. And, afte I reverted them, that editor came to my talk page to call me a name. .. My main concern is the false death notices that said editor os doing, potentially causing panic for potential readers who might take it seriously. Please take a look at this account and do as you see appropriate:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2602:306:CF89:95F0:AC12:6BB:2602:1BF3

Thank you. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 12:47, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked, thanks!– Gilliam (talk) 12:51, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Gilliam. We can't be having readers get a false sense of panic that one of their favorite celebrities has died, only to find out it was a prank. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 12:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another prank only account

Sorry to bother you again so soon, but it appears that (what I assume to be) the same prankster is doing the same death notice prank again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2602:306:CF89:95F0:E54F:ED25:10EA:7BA0

Thanks in advance. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 13:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for evasion. Thanks.– Gilliam (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rollback

Thanks very much for granting me these rights. What with the heavy and persistent vandalism nowadays, I think this tool will help me greatly in tidying up.

Best,

GAB (talk) 23:44, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I hope to continue to see you around.– Gilliam (talk) 23:53, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello?

Could you explain why you just undid every single change I made to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discredited_HIV/AIDS_origins_theories  ? They helped the article immensely, and even if you disagree with structural changes, there are numerous typos that I fixed.

Replied at User talk:50.252.14.210.– Gilliam (talk) 14:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Thanks for patrolling my talk page. That user is almost certainly a sock puppet of PennySeven and MonteDaCunca, but I don't have enough yet to request an investigation. Prof. Mc (talk) 15:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

For your fast admin actions today. Tolly4bolly 15:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Section blankning in college football

Hi Gilliam, I tried to handle the situation myself, but need some help. An IP editor keeps blanking and changing sections of the Ohio State football pages. I asked them on their talk page not to do it, but they keep on doing it. Could you help? Here is their page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/96.241.211.252 ... Johnsmith2116 (talk) 16:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know enough about this topic to become involved. You can report the dispute at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.– Gilliam (talk) 16:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

i am south korean. Our media says kang nung su is dead

Thank you!

Thank you for quickly reverting vandalism! I was more than surprised when I saw the huge number of vandalism edits you undid on the Recent Changes page. Dakar (talk) 01:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it may look like quite a feat, but there is a user script for rollback all.– Gilliam (talk) 01:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jammu and Kashmir

Hi. Jammu and kashmir isn't an indian state. Plz remove this information. Thsnks Zaif1010 (talk) 07:40, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, Jammu and Kashmir is indeed an Indian state. In Wikipedia articles, you must not insert your non-neutral point of view. Rely instead on what the reliable and verifiable sources say.– Gilliam (talk) 07:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gilliam! If you are not from india so, Please try to understand! Jammu and kashmir isn't situated in India nor in Pakistan. It is an occupied territory. I just want people read the right information on Wikipedia. Here is the page of this article Kashmir conflict thanks! Zaif1010 (talk) 20:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What was wrong with my addition?

The other day I added on to the history section of the Le Sueur, Minnesota article with some more in depth incite on the history and importance of Green Giant on Le Sueur noticing only the Mayo House was represented in the History section. I was wondering what I had done wrong in writing such addition and would appreciate some insight for future articles.

P.S. what does ce stand for? JohnWerewright (talk) 17:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My edit summary stood for copy edit. I felt the section you added overall pertained more to the economy section of the Le Sueur article than to the history section, so I had moved it down the page to a new section.[1]

Zevulun Charlop

As an alumnus of Yeshiva University, and of RIETS, I can tell you that this is one of Rabbi Charlop's most reknown current roles, which is also noteworthy especially due to his age and current state. As far as I am aware, merely booking this interview is itself a challenge. Knowing that Rabbi Charlop is still involved in completion of basically every student's career is also practically important for RIETS candidates- because the student will have to prepare for the interview. I did not expand into this detail, because some of it is borderlines on gossip, and to those that this applies- the repercussions will be understood. Furthermore, it would be difficult to prove that students prepare differently for Rabbi Charlop exit interviews than to whomever will replace him eventually, so I stuck to the simple facts. Please describe in more detail if you still feel that this is not important, or kindly change it back. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.188.117 (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I restored your edit. At first your contribution didn't make sense to me, but now I understand. Sorry for the inconvenience.– Gilliam (talk) 04:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Meek Mill

I've been doling out 48-hour blocks to any autoconfirmed accounts that vandalize the article over the protection, I suggest doing the same if any more show up. I didn't want to go full protection. Going to sleep now §FreeRangeFrogcroak 06:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what's going on there. I can't find any confirmed reports of his death. Perhaps full protection would be the right move. We don't want a repeat of Sinbad, if you can recall that incident.– Gilliam (talk) 06:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, all this is actually the result of some twitter spat or something. He's certainly not dead. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 06:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

17 minutes is pretty quick for a busy person to catch and revert vandalism spam, as you did a while ago in the crowdfunding article. Good job!  Etamni | ✉  08:36, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's always something. Thanks!– Gilliam (talk) 08:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And four minutes to find your cookie. Well, we do know which is more important!  Etamni | ✉  08:43, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, if you knew my secret perhaps it would not seem like such a feat. I use a user script which enables me to revert all at once. Rollback all can be used by any user with rollback rights.– Gilliam (talk) 08:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but you still have to take the time to see the change, recognize it for what it is, and initiate the process -- even if the script takes care of the actual reversion (as does Twinkle, which I recently started using). Anyway, it's nice to see that articles on my watch list are being patrolled by others too!  Etamni | ✉  08:53, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guy

Sorry about not reverting edits far enough back on Guy. I think the person who added the inappropriate matter might have been in good faith, however. That person may have been intending to add a reference to Guy-wire by simply giving a simplified definition, and not realizing the purpose of the page. Donner60 (talk) 06:13, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At a second look. you're right. My revert stands without prejudice.– Gilliam (talk) 06:26, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas João

Hi there GILLIAM, from Portugal,

is it possible to revert to my revision and not NFC123's? Or at least write "Born in Luanda," in the first line of the body of article yourself, please? This page has been bombarded with vandalism like crazy, but I am not one of the enablers OK, I have been fighting it with all my heart, have been doing so in thousands of articles in my (almost) nine years here.

Attentively, happy week --84.90.219.128 (talk) 18:10, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Ann

Thanks for semi-protecting Lisa Ann's article, but I think it would be better to semi-protect it indefinitely. Two days of semi-protection just isn't enough. This article was previously semi-protected for a whole year (June 26, 2014 - June 26, 2015) and vandalism to it resumed within two days of the semi-protection expiring ([2]) and has continued on a regular basis until today. Rebecca1990 (talk) 17:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added Lisa Ann to my watchlist, and once protection expires, I will reapply it for a longer period if needed.– Gilliam (talk) 17:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Midlife Crisis

Hi, I just received a note from you about whether a tag I left on the Midlife Crisis entry was a test. Apologies if I did not follow proper Wikipedia procedure. I didn't mean to leave a test tag but a real one.

I'm not sure whether there is a waffling or "too much quibbling" tag but oftentimes I go to a Wikipedia entry and it seems to be arguing with itself too much. Do you know what I mean? It reads as if someone first wrote a nice, well-presented article, with just the right amount of skepticism, and unfolding in just the right order. But that, afterwards, someone littered the first few paragraphs with specifics or severe doubts over whether the subject even exists, causing the article to read in a way that is all over the place.

That's what I found to be the case with the Midlife Crisis one. There's this "Crisis vs. Stressors" section that confuses the reader with a series of objections to the idea of talking about a Midlife Crisis, before we have even had a chance to get a handle on the subject.

2.30.138.254 (talk) 08:17, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have not heard of waffle in that context. Moreover, I suggest explaining what is wrong with the article on its talk page before adding the tag.– Gilliam (talk) 08:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the pic above should now be two cookies. I was working through the troublesome edits at traffic light when you rolled it back a ways. There were a mix of vandalism edits and less-than-helpful good faith edits in there, and I was imagining the work a manual fix would take when I refreshed and saw you had beat me to it. Thank you.  Etamni | ✉  09:15, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure no problem. With Twinkle to revert a multiple-user string of edits, "compare selected versions" in the page history, then click "restore this version".– Gilliam (talk) 10:52, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

You are always so speedy to catch spam and vandalism. From one RC patroller to another, great job! Jwood (leave me a message) See what I'm up to 13:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the treat! I use User:Lupin/Anti-vandal tool for vandalism patrol. It's an older tool than most seem to use now, but works well for me.– Gilliam (talk) 13:24, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP block

Thank you for the block. However, I think it's more than a simple school block. The IP was evading a block per a sock Andrew.tisler who also follows the same disruptive pattern. Regardless, thanks for the help. I was about to file a report. Callmemirela {Talk} ♑ 23:49, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which IP?– Gilliam (talk) 23:50, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Special:Contributions/66.203.20.175. Callmemirela {Talk} ♑ 23:52, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. That IP is registered to Miami Valley Educational Computer Association (schools in Dayton, Ohio, metropolitan area). So while the socking is a problem, the schoolblock seems to be the right action at this point.– Gilliam (talk) 23:53, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

A possible glitch

Hello Gilliam, I was wondering if there may have been a possible technical problem with Wikipedia a few minutes ago? My account was signed out twice within a span of five minutes, and it wasn't me who signed it out, it did it on its own. Do you know of a problem that happened to cause this? Johnsmith2116 (talk) 19:11, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's happened to me before, as well. Try clearing your cache (Press Control + F5 simultaneously). Hope that helps.– Gilliam (talk) 19:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clinton Township, Rock County, Minnesota, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clinton, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dashes

If you don't already have it, you might be interested in this script. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll try it out.– Gilliam (talk) 21:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for talk page removal.

I think you better revoke User:31.47.245.36's talk page abilities. He is making an unblock request, and the reason he gave was, "RAHOWA". Studentaccountantghost4 (talk) 19:16, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gilliam&oldid=675306844"