Talk:1865: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:14, 13 August 2015

Years Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

In reading a Civil War Diary, "A Wartime Diary of a Georgia Girl", Eliza Andrews identifies January 1, 1865 as a Wednesday, rather than a Sunday. Do we have our years out of sync here? I think with the Sesquicentennial of the Civil War we need to correct this ASAP or make a notation on the pages for the war years if the calendar has changed.

Jrigdon at researchonline.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrigdon (talk • contribs) 11:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some year layout proposals which would affect this page: the year in topic paragraph would be replaced with a see also box.

If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 19:04, 6 May 2004 (UTC)(talk)[reply]

Mendel

According to a external link on the Gregor Mendel page, his paper was read to the Bruenn Natural History Society (which is probably what this page means by "formulated") on Feb. 8 and March 8. How would I incorporate this -- two separate dates, or just the first one? Brutannica 02:04, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Format

[See: Talk:1850#Format. -Wikid77 06:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)][reply]

Welsh settlers' arrival at Argentina's Chubut Valley

This page gives the date 27 July, however elsewhere it's not listed at 27 July but at 28 July. Which is correct? --Duncan MacCall (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leopold II of Belgium's accession

Leopold II became King of the Belgians on December 17, 1865. A week after his father's (Leopold I) death. In Belgium, the royal succession isn't automatic, but rather occurs upon the taking of the accession oath before the Belgian Parliament. GoodDay (talk) 01:14, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 01:14, 13 August 2015 edit GoodDay (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 489,808 edits →Leopold II of Belgium's accession: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:14, 13 August 2015 edit undo GoodDay (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 489,808 edits m →Leopold II of Belgium's accession Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:
	== Leopold II of Belgium's accession ==		== Leopold II of Belgium's accession ==

	Leopold II became King of the Belgians on December ''17'', 1865. A week after his father's (Leopold I) death. In Belgium, the royal succession is automatic, but rather occurs upon the taking of the accession oath before the Belgian Parliament. [[User:GoodDay\|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay\|talk]]) 01:14, 13 August 2015 (UTC)		Leopold II became King of the Belgians on December ''17'', 1865. A week after his father's (Leopold I) death. In Belgium, the royal succession isn't automatic, but rather occurs upon the taking of the accession oath before the Belgian Parliament. [[User:GoodDay\|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay\|talk]]) 01:14, 13 August 2015 (UTC)