Talk:Pan-genome: Difference between revisions
Largoplazo (talk | contribs) Proposing to merge Pangenom into Pan-genome (TW) |
Georgetets (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
They seem to be related concepts, though not the same, and the word is misspelled throughout this article and in it's title, as the cited originator spells it "pangenome", with an "e" on the end. Perhaps they are two aspects of the same concept and should be covered together. Otherwise, the spelling needs to be corrected here and we need some means of disambiguation between them. On the other hand, it isn't clear that the concept explained in this article is even [[WP:N|notable]]. Is it only one author's conceptualization or has it taken root? [[User:Largoplazo|—Largo Plazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 20:38, 13 August 2015 (UTC) |
They seem to be related concepts, though not the same, and the word is misspelled throughout this article and in it's title, as the cited originator spells it "pangenome", with an "e" on the end. Perhaps they are two aspects of the same concept and should be covered together. Otherwise, the spelling needs to be corrected here and we need some means of disambiguation between them. On the other hand, it isn't clear that the concept explained in this article is even [[WP:N|notable]]. Is it only one author's conceptualization or has it taken root? [[User:Largoplazo|—Largo Plazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 20:38, 13 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
Hi! The Pan-genome and Pangenom concept are principally other items instead of close writhing. The concept Pangenom is a universal approach for the collective genetic system of all living organisms. It is not correct to merge it with Pan-genome because they propose absolutely different items. |
|||
[[User:Georgetets|Georgetets]] ([[User talk:Georgetets|talk]]) 21:53, 13 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:54, 13 August 2015
Template:WikiProject Computational Biology}
I don't think the original justification for deleting this article hold true any more. For example, see: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&cmd=DetailsSearch&term=pan-genome
However, I guess this page should be moved from pangenome to pan-genome.
--Dan|(talk) 09:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Move carried out. Alexbateman (talk) 10:31, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- I would also add that I think this article is highly relevant (rather than 'not notable') because of the recent growth in next generation sequencing technologies. The data produced by these technologies are changing the way we think about genomics. --Dan|(talk) 09:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Article about Prochlorococcus
I linked to http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.0030231 but I dont know how to make this link appear properly in Wikipedia. Anyway, the article linked mentions pan-genome. 84.112.136.52 (talk) 19:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Pangenom
They seem to be related concepts, though not the same, and the word is misspelled throughout this article and in it's title, as the cited originator spells it "pangenome", with an "e" on the end. Perhaps they are two aspects of the same concept and should be covered together. Otherwise, the spelling needs to be corrected here and we need some means of disambiguation between them. On the other hand, it isn't clear that the concept explained in this article is even notable. Is it only one author's conceptualization or has it taken root? —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:38, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi! The Pan-genome and Pangenom concept are principally other items instead of close writhing. The concept Pangenom is a universal approach for the collective genetic system of all living organisms. It is not correct to merge it with Pan-genome because they propose absolutely different items.
Georgetets (talk) 21:53, 13 August 2015 (UTC)