Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amila Karunanayake: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Amila Karunanayake: delete |
Randykitty (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[WP:☮|<font size="4px" color="Green ">☮</font>]][[User:Jaaron95|<font color="CornflowerBlue" face="Times">'''JAaron95'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jaaron95|<font color="Green" face= "Times">Talk</font>]]</sup> 15:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Amila Karunanayake]]</div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[WP:☮|<font size="4px" color="Green ">☮</font>]][[User:Jaaron95|<font color="CornflowerBlue" face="Times">'''JAaron95'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jaaron95|<font color="Green" face= "Times">Talk</font>]]</sup> 15:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Amila Karunanayake]]</div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
||
*'''Delete''' - clearly does not meet [[WP:GNG]] or [[WP:NACTOR]]. Searches on news, newspapers and JStor reveal a single 5 year old hit, which is only a brief mention. Highbeam reveals a couple of more, but again, brief mentions. 3 brief mentions in 5 years is hardly notable. [[User:onel5969|<b><font color="#536895">Onel</font><font color="#FFB300">5969</font></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 16:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - clearly does not meet [[WP:GNG]] or [[WP:NACTOR]]. Searches on news, newspapers and JStor reveal a single 5 year old hit, which is only a brief mention. Highbeam reveals a couple of more, but again, brief mentions. 3 brief mentions in 5 years is hardly notable. [[User:onel5969|<b><font color="#536895">Onel</font><font color="#FFB300">5969</font></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 16:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' I checked all links and references and none are in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Does not meet [[WP:GNG]] or [[WP:NACTOR]]. --[[User:Randykitty|Randykitty]] ([[User talk:Randykitty|talk]]) 10:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:26, 19 August 2015
- Amila Karunanayake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject is not notable and does not satisfy the criteria under WP:ANYBIO or WP:ARTIST. It was previously tagged for notability which was removed by the article's creator without any changesor additional references to support notability on the basis "Subject is only popular/notable amongst Sri Lankan community" Dan arndt (talk) 02:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I do see evidence that he is known in his community and has received ongoing coverage from 2007 onwards. It's not the greatest coverage, but it exists, and I think there is enough there to justify the article existing, although it does need quite a bit of tidying up and improving of citations/style. He is still receiving namechecks and coverage in 2015, now as a judge for these contests rather than as a winner. Despite my well-documented feelings on pageants, I don't see any compelling reasons why he shouldn't be on here, but similarly, I don't see anything super-compelling as to why he should - but I see many more reasons to lean towards keep. Mabalu (talk) 12:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Subject is only popular/notable amongst Sri Lankan community. He is not only a model but an upcoming film actor in Sri Lanka (may not be notable in Hollywood or Bollywood).DilJco (talk) 00:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment, whether the subject is popular in Sri Lanka or not, the onus is on you to establish their notability in accordance with WP guidelines. Dan arndt (talk) 01:38, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment, subject's notability is already established with available references and will be further improved.DilJco (talk) 02:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 10:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 10:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 Talk 15:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 Talk 15:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - clearly does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Searches on news, newspapers and JStor reveal a single 5 year old hit, which is only a brief mention. Highbeam reveals a couple of more, but again, brief mentions. 3 brief mentions in 5 years is hardly notable. Onel5969 TT me 16:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I checked all links and references and none are in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. --Randykitty (talk) 10:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)